Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2021 Year 2021 This

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act - appellant did ...


Appellant Escapes Penalty: No Involvement in Import or Handling Under Customs Act Section 112(b.

June 25, 2021

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act - appellant did not file the IGMs in question - Undisputed peculiar facts of the case are that the appellant is neither the importer nor the owner who had acquired possession nor in any way concerned with the carrying, removing, etc., of the goods in question, and Revenue has nowhere ascribed knowledge of the appellant as to the confiscation - the Revenue has also nowhere offered redemption in lieu of the confiscation in so far as the appellant is concerned - No penalty - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of Penalty u/s 112 (a) and (b) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 - Abetment in mis-declaration of goods and evasion of duty - The appellants were accused of being...

  2. Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

  3. Levy of penalty on the Director of the Company - Valuation of imported goods - import of luxury vehicles by misusing the Transfer of Residence (TR) Scheme - The Tribunal...

  4. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

  5. The appellants imported a helicopter (Model No.412-EP, Sr. No.36643 registered as VT-HGK) vide B/E No.397583 dated 26.12.2007. The exemption entry 347B of the N/N....

  6. Imposition of Penalties u/s 112(a) & (b) and 114AA - Each appellant denied direct involvement or knowledge of the illegal activities, claiming to have played different...

  7. Customs broker licence revocation - importer engaged appellant to file import bill of entry but appellant used another broker's credentials instead of its own - imported...

  8. Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

  9. Anushka Sharma - Wedding Ring – Customs Law on Import of Jewellery - Duty & Penalty

  10. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  11. Levy of penalty u/s 112 & 114 of the Customs Act, 1962 - allegation of abating the importer - In present import, there is no evidence to allege that appellants were...

  12. Contravention of Sections 8(3), 8(4), and 9(1)(b) of FERA established - illegal foreign exchange remittance abroad disguised as charges for imports that never occurred....

  13. Imposition of penalty u/s 112 (d) and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on Customs Broker - appellant was only a Customs Broker and not the importer - the only allegation...

  14. CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

  15. The case involved a penalty u/s 112(B) of the Customs Act, 1962 against an employee of a Customs House Agent (CHA) for allegedly concealing information affecting a bill...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates