Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2021 Year 2021 This

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-disclosure of capital gain ...


Court Rules Against Reopening Assessment: No Capital Gain Taxable for 2011-12, Errors Found in AO's Basis.

July 2, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - non-disclosure of capital gain - sale of assets which were transferred to the partnership firm as capital contribution - since the transfer of land as a part of capital contribution the partnership firm took place in the year 2008, the same can be assessed only in the AY 2009-10 and not in the AY 2011-12. Therefore, for the year under consideration no amount of capital gain could be said to have taxable. - Reasons lack validity and the AO had proceeded on erroneous premise and there was no sufficient material before the AO to take a prima-facie view that income of the assessee for the year under consideration has escaped assessment. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Capital Gain - Transfer u/s 2(47)(v) - assessment year - AO himself has given credit for the amount of capital gains declared for the assessment year 2013-14, while...

  2. LTCG on 'Sale of Co-ownership Land' - Having adopted the DVO’s valuation in one of the co-owners case who is the brother of the assessee for the assessment year i.e....

  3. The Appellate Tribunal held that the assessment orders issued u/s 153C for the assessment years 2011-12 and 2012-13 were beyond the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer...

  4. Validity of reopening an assessment u/s 147 of the Income Tax Act, the distinction between "change of opinion" and "reasons to believe," and the classification of income...

  5. Assessment u/s 153A - incriminating material found in search or not? - On the date of search, admittedly, the assessment with respect to the AY under consideration...

  6. Capital Gains - transfer by mere agreement - the transfer of the above stated property took place only in AY 2011-12, when assessee has declared the capital gain...

  7. The ITAT Mumbai addressed errors in capital gain computation. The Assessee's claim of ₹ 859,680 was accepted over the AO's ₹ 791,221. An application u/s 154...

  8. The High Court held that the Assessing Officer had credible reasons to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2011-12. During the search and seizure...

  9. Assessment u/s 153A - Validity examined. Assessments cannot be framed without incriminating material found during search u/s 132. Completed assessments u/s 143(3) cannot...

  10. Unverifiable purchases - Merely maintaining the books of accounts and not giving a plausible explanation regarding the purchases, the same cannot be stated that it is...

  11. HC accepted petitioner's alternative proposal to pay additional 5% of outstanding tax demand for AY 2011-12, bringing total payment to 20% of assessed amount. This...

  12. The Appellate Tribunal examined the reopening of assessment after four years and the addition u/s 68 of the Income Tax Act. It held that the original assessment was...

  13. Reopening of assessment u/s 147 was challenged. The Assessing Officer (AO) had disallowed 20% of total sundry creditors in the regular assessment u/s 143(3). The AO...

  14. HC quashed reassessment notice under s.148 concerning lease payments, foreign currency transactions, and goodwill depreciation. Court found no valid grounds for...

  15. Validity of appointing Special Audit u/s 142(2A) - In the present case, the proceedings dated 09.12.2011 was treated as a show cause notice for all purposes both by the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates