Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
VAT - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights July 2021 Year 2021 This

Validity of reassessment order - Input tax credit on purchases ...


Court Rules Bona Fide Purchaser Not Liable for Selling Dealer's KVAT Act Non-Compliance; ITC Reassessment Scrutinized.

July 8, 2021

Case Laws     VAT and Sales Tax     HC

Validity of reassessment order - Input tax credit on purchases from three dealers - a bonafide purchaser cannot be put at jeopardy, when he has done all that the law expects him to comply. The purchasing dealer has no means to ascertain and secure compliance provisions of the KVAT Act by the selling dealer - it cannot be said that the assessee has conspired with the selling dealers to avail the ITC fraudulently. If the revenue is able to demonstrate that the assessee and the selling dealers have conspired, then it is still open for the Revenue to initiate necessary steps against the assessee as well. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Provisional Release of seized of vehicle - Vehicle sold by the diplomat in breach of conditions of import - bona fide purchaser - liability of paying the entire...

  2. Whether the petitioner bona fide purchaser of the property and that she was not aware of any of the proceedings or arrears of tax payable by the dealer? - it can be...

  3. Validity of input tax credit (ITC) u/s 16 of the UP GST Act hinges on compliance with specified conditions to avoid double taxation. The burden lies on the dealer to...

  4. Sections 16(2)(c) and 16(2)(d) of the Assam and Central Goods and Services Tax Acts, 2017, were challenged regarding the validity of punishing a purchasing dealer for...

  5. This trade circular clarifies the availability of input tax credit (ITC) on demo vehicles used by authorized dealers for motor vehicles. The key points are: ITC is...

  6. The circular clarifies the availability of input tax credit on demo vehicles used by authorized dealers for providing trial runs and demonstrating features to potential...

  7. Seeking to remove the encumbrance of the attachment in the petitioner's property - specific case of the petitioner is that the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser of the...

  8. The HC held that the petitioner is a bona fide purchaser who acquired the property before the predicate offence was registered. A bona fide purchaser who acquires...

  9. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Revenue may or may not agree with this understanding of law of the assessee but the fact that there can be a bona fide view to that effect...

  10. Compliance with rule 3A by certain Nidhis - Rule 23A of the Nidhi Rules, 2014 - As amended

  11. The Bombay High Court addressed non-compliance with Rule 28 of the NCLT Rules, 2016 regarding timely registration and disposal of applications u/s 94 and 95 of the...

  12. Input tax credit - Denial of ITC in the hands of purchasing dealer or recovery from the seller for failure to deposit the tax - Prior to amendment and substitution of...

  13. Input tax credit - If the selling dealer has not deposited the amount in full or a part thereof, it would be for the Revenue to proceed against the selling dealer. But...

  14. Refund of ITC - forcing an option to the assessee - It is clear from the narrative thus far that the dealer has two options i.e., refund or carrying forward the ITC to...

  15. The High Court upheld the validity of the impugned order u/s 107(11) of the Karnataka Goods and Services Act, 2017. The petitioner's contention that the adjudicating...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates