Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2021 Year 2021 This

Ex-parte order - Principles of Natural Justice - When Corporate ...


Court Rejects Corporate Debtor's COVID-19 Excuse, Upholds Natural Justice Principle for Missing Adjudication Hearing.

August 13, 2021

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     AT

Ex-parte order - Principles of Natural Justice - When Corporate Debtor is a Company where there are more Directors rather than only one as can be seen from the Balance Confirmation issued by the Company, it does not lie in the mouth of the Corporate Debtor to claim that one Director was suffering from COVID so the Corporate Debtor could not cause appearance before the Adjudicating Authority - there is no reasons why before 16.02.2021 when hearing took place before Adjudicating Authority, Corporate Debtor did not approach Adjudicating Authority to seek to defend. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. COVID-19 related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Circular

  2. Operational Creditor failed to prove debt and default beyond threshold limit against Corporate Debtor. Adjudicating Authority rightly rejected Section 9 application as...

  3. SVLDRS - The court acknowledged that the petitioner failed to make the balance payment within the extended period due to financial constraints post-COVID-19. However, it...

  4. The High Court held that the delay of 80 days in filing the Return of Income should be condoned as the petitioner faced genuine hardship due to valid reasons arising...

  5. Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable...

  6. The High Court found a violation of the principles of natural justice due to the Assessing Authority's denial of an oral hearing opportunity. The court held that even if...

  7. Initiation of CIRP - Corporate Debtor although once appeared before the Adjudicating Authority but neither filed any reply nor appeared thereafter and Adjudicating...

  8. Corporate Debtors failed to deliver housing units to allottees within stipulated time despite receiving payments. NCLAT rejected Corporate Debtors' contentions regarding...

  9. Corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) initiated against corporate debtor and corporate guarantor. Financial creditor granted loan to corporate debtor, secured...

  10. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dismissed the appeal, upholding the order admitting the Section 7 application filed by ICICI Bank against the...

  11. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, addressed the validity of the admission of a section 7 application in a Corporate Insolvency...

  12. Rejection of the simultaneous claim by the Resolution Professional of the Corporate Debtor - Claim filed by the Applicant with respect to the corporate guarantee given...

  13. The court rejected the petitioner's application for condonation of a 216-day delay in filing their Income Tax Returns (ITRs). The reasons cited by the petitioner, delay...

  14. The High Court rejected a claim for proportional Input Tax Credit u/s 19 of the KVAT Act for losses like spillage, ground loss, and during transportation. The court held...

  15. Right to claim over property occupied by the Corporate Debtor - Even though the object behind imposing moratorium under section 14 of IB Code, is to prevent depletion of...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates