Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with ...


COVID-19 restrictions considered reasonable cause for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements, exculpating assessee from penalty.

September 7, 2024

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable cause. The Tribunal held that in the prevailing pandemic situation, it was unreasonable for tax authorities to expect strict compliance from the assessee. The failure to furnish information/documents during the reassessment proceedings was attributable to the subsistence of COVID-19, which prevented effective compliance. Demanding documentary evidence to prove the reasonable cause of COVID-19 restrictions suggested non-application of mind by the authorities. The Tribunal relied on the Supreme Court's recognition of COVID-19 restrictions and held that the pandemic situation, along with the apex court's order, formed a reasonable cause u/s 273B, exculpating the assessee from penalty u/s 272A(1)(d). Consequently, the penalty order was set aside as unwarranted.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Appellate Tribunal considered a case involving the levy of penalty u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) due to the Accountant's Covid-19...

  2. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

  3. Delay in depositing TDS amount ranging from 31 to 214 days due to COVID-19 pandemic constituted reasonable and sufficient cause. As per High Court [2023 (11) TMI 447],...

  4. Renewal of approval under proviso (ii) (b) to section 17 (2) (viii) - approval for providing treatment for Covid-19 patients - Since the show cause notice issued relies...

  5. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

  6. The High Court held that the delay of 80 days in filing the Return of Income should be condoned as the petitioner faced genuine hardship due to valid reasons arising...

  7. Penalty u/s. 272A(1)(d) - non compliance to notice u/s. 142(1) due to covid pandemic - addition u/s. 68 - As it is observed that when there is a reasonable cause for the...

  8. Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

  9. MCA’s Frequently Asked Questions on eligibility of CSR expenditure related to COVID-19 activities - News

  10. Relaxation in adherence to prescribed timelines issued by SEBI due to Covid 19 - Circular

  11. COVID-19 related Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) - Circular

  12. Preventive measures to be taken to contains the spread of Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19) - Trade Notice

  13. Tax assessment order set aside due to defects in show cause notice, failure to consider Covid-19 impact on business operations. Taxpayer engaged in milk manufacturing...

  14. Additional relaxations / clarifications in relation to compliance with certain provisions of the SEBI (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2015...

  15. Grant of Moratorium due to COVID-19 pandemic situation - Restraint on respondent from recovering loan repayment instalments/EMI due - RBI Circular dated 27.03.2020 -...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates