Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - ...

ITAT decision errors aren't rectifiable u/s 254(2); appeal to High Court for relief on Section 271(1)(c) penalties.

August 21, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - Without prejudice to the above, assuming the findings of the ITAT is not correct than it would not amount to a mistake apparent from record which could be rectified under the provision of section 254(2) of the Act. If the decision of the ITAT is wrong than the aggrieved parties can approach to the Higher Judicial forum i.e. Jurisdictional High Court. But such findings cannot be rectified on the reasoning that there is a mistake apparent from the record. If we do so it would amount to review its own order by the ITAT which is not permissible. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Rectification u/s 254 - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was deleted - ...

ITAT decision errors aren't rectifiable u/s 254(2); appeal to High Court for relief on Section 271(1)(c) penalties.

August 21, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an...

ITAT recalled its earlier order due to discovery of inadvertent errors, specifically the reliance on non-existing case laws identified during suo-moto review. Exercising...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

HC set aside ITAT's rectification order under Section 254(2) of Income Tax Act, finding ITAT exceeded its jurisdiction in reviewing income classification. The dispute...

Levy of Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - The ITAT ruled that since there was no variation between the returned and assessed income, there was no concealment of income by the...

Penalty levied u/ss 271(1)(c) and 271AAA for unexplained investment and addition made by adopting net profit as per the books of accounts at 12.85% on the suppressed...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

The ITAT held that penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was not imposable on the assessee. The assessee had voluntarily paid tax on income from sale of shares three years prior to...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Defective notice - ITAT observed that the notice issued by the AO would be bad in law if it did not specify which limb of Section 271(1) (c) the...

Rectification u/s 254 - non consideration of Tribunal decision in order which was referred and provided in paper book - an apparent error requiring necessary...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed for denying deduction u/s 80DD for a disabled person with over 80% disability. The assessee, a retired individual, had submitted...

Levy of penalties u/ss 122 and 129 of CGST/SGST Acts - expiry of e-way bill - mens rea in penalty imposition. Technically, violation of law by petitioner in transporting...

Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

Challenge the order passed by the Assessing Officer u/s 201(1) and 201(1A) r/w 254 after receipt of recovery notice u/s 156 - the petitioner is not remedy less as...

Quick Updates: