No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for ...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowed depreciation claim.

January 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for disallowance of depreciation. The ITAT held that the assessee did not deliberately claim depreciation with an intention to make an inaccurate claim, as evidenced by the voluntary withdrawal of the ground before the CIT(A) and non-claiming of depreciation in subsequent years. The ITAT relied on the Supreme Court's decision in CIT vs. Pricewaterhouse Coopers Pvt. Ltd., which held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) would be imposed for a bona fide, inadvertent, or human error. The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee.

View Source

← Previous Next →

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) was imposed on the assessee for ...

No penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for disallowed depreciation claim.

January 11, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Claim of depreciation on financed leased assets - AO while disallowing the claim of depreciation has not considered the exclusion of the...

Penalty under section 271(1)(c) - disallowance of depreciation - he explanation given by the assessee for the claim of depreciation is neither bona fide nor...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - deemed income being loss claimed and disallowed - The AO has also not specified the charge on which penalty is being levied - No penalty - AT

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Merely because assessee claimed depreciation at 25% treating items to be plant, which claim was not acceptable to revenue, would not by itself...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Held that:- Wrongful claim of depreciation - The attempts made by the assessee are indicative of frivolous nature of claim - penalty confirmed - AT

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) – the penalty imposed for disallowing claim of expenditure on foreign education and foreign travelling cannot be upheld - AT

Penalty u/s. 271(1)(c) - deduction u/s. 80GGC denied - second round of appeal - the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, holding that the claim for deduction was...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - claim of depreciation @100% instead of 15% - Temporary Wooden structures like interiors, glow signs etc. being Furniture & Fixture - Levy of...

Imposition of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The explanation given by the assessee for the depreciation claim, is neither bona-fide, nor substantiated - penalty confirmed - HC

The ITAT ruled in favor of the assessee on the following issues: 1. Addition u/s 68 for refund of advances received from different parties was deleted. The ITAT held...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Making an incorrect claim in law cannot tantamount to furnishing inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Act. Mere making of a...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Excess depreciation claim - it is merely a case of difference arising out of the reworking of the carry forward depreciation by the AO by...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - deduction of LTCG u/s 54F - The assessee acted in bona fide belief and made the claim is not acceptable due to any reason and was...

Quick Updates: