Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of transport expenses - ...

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 8, 2021

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of transport expenses - payment made in cash - Just because the payments were made in cash cannot be a basis to doubt the genuineness of the expenditure. Since the disallowance are made on adhoc basis by applying the rate of 15%, holding the assessee liable to pay penalty for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income cannot be held to be justified. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Mere disallowance of expenses u/s 40A(3) would not invite penalty for concealing or furnishing inaccurate particulars of income. Assessee disclosed all particulars...

  2. Disallowance of deduction claimed u/s 24(b) was rejected as the assessee was incurring interest expenditure for redevelopment of the house, and the CIT(A) rightly...

  3. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance of interest expenditure under section 43B as well as disallowance export product development expenses - Just because the assessee...

  4. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that no penalty u/s 271(1)(c) can be imposed for an ad-hoc disallowance of 20% of expenses made by the Assessing Officer....

  5. Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance u/s 40 (a)(ia) only for lack of payment of TDS while the payment was bonafide - Though the failure on the part of the...

  6. Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

  7. Penalty u/ s 271(1)(c) - Disallowance on account of personnel expenses, operative expenses and finance expenses - it a “mere disallowance” of an expense does not warrant...

  8. Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Assessee company failed to provide bonafide explanation for inflated expenses claimed in revised return, contrary to audited...

  9. Levy of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of bogus purchases by applying the profit rate - Once there is no reason to disbelieve the sales made by the assessee and...

  10. Disallowance u/s 40A(3) - transactions and payments made in cash - assessee filed affidavits from sub-contractors of assessee firm and they insisted for cash payments to...

  11. Addition u/s 40A - sum paid in cash in respect of purchase of the two immoveable properties - Sale deed has been executed on 18.8.2013 and the payment has been made on...

  12. Disallowance u/s.40A(3) - expenses towards air ticket and hotel expenses in cash in excess of prescribed limit u/s.40A(3) - there is merit in arguments of the assessee...

  13. MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

  14. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - a case of furnishing of inaccurate particulars of income has not been made out against the assessee. - Though, similar disallowances were made by...

  15. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowance of professional fees for non-deduction of TDS - Merely not filing appeal on the contesting issues does not tantamount to concealment...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates