ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Penalties on Firm u/s 271(1)(c) for Unexplained Cash Credits and False Expense Claims.

January 24, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against appellant firm for multiple violations. Unexplained cash credits in partners' capital accounts violated Explanation-1 requirements as firm failed to provide satisfactory explanations. Penalty sustained for understated business income where appellant's claim of inadvertent omission was rejected. Additional penalties confirmed for false claims regarding FBT expenses, donations, and prior period expenses where appellant admitted inadmissibility before CIT(A). Tribunal found appellant failed to substantiate expense genuineness and maintained CIT(A)'s finding that these constituted wrong claims warranting penalties. All grounds of appeal dismissed, confirming original penalty orders.

View Source

← Previous Next →

ITAT upheld penalties imposed under s.271(1)(c) against ...

Tax Tribunal Upholds Penalties on Firm u/s 271(1)(c) for Unexplained Cash Credits and False Expense Claims.

January 24, 2025

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Imposition of penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act for two types of additions: (1) the addition made u/s 50C on the difference between stamp duty value and sale...

This case deals with the levy of penalties u/ss 271AAA and 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act in relation to various additions made to the assessee's income based on seized...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - loan from friends and relatives for financing his son’s USA visa - when the evidences and explanation furnished in support of cash credits are...

Penalty levied u/s 271(1)(C) - exemption u/s 80-IC - income in the garb of fictitious cash sales - Assessing Officer as well as the Appellate Authority, rightly gave...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal deleted the penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) for non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) during reassessment proceedings....

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - disallowances in the quantum assessment order - whether any concealment or furnishing of inaccurate particulars proved? - Tribunal directs...

Penalty u/s.271(1)(c) OR 271AAA - unexplained cash deposits - the rate of penalty @ 200% is contemplated only u/s.271(1)(c) of the Act and not u/s.271AAA of the Act. It...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(b) - Non-compliance with a notice issued u/s 142(1) - The Tribunal noted that in a previous round of proceedings, a penalty under section 271(1)(b) of...

Levy of Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) in case of voluntary surrender of income - disallowance of claim of loss - Assessee offered the loss voluntarily to avoid litigation and...

This case deals with the penalty u/s 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, imposed for disallowance of losses on forex derivatives treated as speculative losses and...

The case involved a dispute over penalty imposition u/ss 271(1)(c) versus 271(1B) for additions related to estimated income from share trading transactions. The...

Monetary limit for filing of appeal by revenue in case of penalty - Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on bogus purchases - Quantum proceedings and penalty proceedings are...

Section 271(1)(c) penalty was held invalid due to improper issuance of notice, as no proceedings were pending when the notice was issued on 19.12.2019. Section 271A...

Penalty proceedings u/s 271(1)(c) - Failure of the assessee to explain the source of cash deposit in the bank account - burden of proof - The ITAT acknowledged the...

Quick Updates: