Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application money and premium ...

Income Tax Act Section 68: Assessing Officer Fails to Prove Bogus Share Transactions, No Income Additions Made.

September 13, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application money and premium received by the assessee-company - sham transactions - Onus to prove - Here in this case, the investee companies are based outside Delhi and if he was not satisfied with the authorized representative sent by them, then at least he could not have issued a commission u/s.133(1)(d) to be examined by the local Income tax authority. Further, these authorized representative have adduced the document but nowhere Assessing Officer has pointed out what was lacking in such documents which was already submitted by these companies in reply to the notice u/s.133(6) and what extra he wanted to examine, has not been mentioned. - No additions - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share application money and premium ...

Income Tax Act Section 68: Assessing Officer Fails to Prove Bogus Share Transactions, No Income Additions Made.

September 13, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The assessee, a professional stock broker, claimed loss on trading of shares which was disallowed by the Assessing Officer (AO) on the grounds that the trades were not...

The High Court held that the Assessing Officer (AO) lacked sufficient material or evidence to reopen the assessment u/s 147 for the Assessment Year 2013-14 in respect of...

The assessee had demonstrated the genuineness of the share transaction resulting in long-term capital gains, which were claimed as exempt u/s 10(38). The Revenue...

Estimation of income - bogus purchases - quantification of profit - The Tribunal noted that during investigations, the alleged suppliers were identified as bogus...

Bogus LTCG - bogus share transaction - As in so far as cancellation of registration of sub-broker by the NSE through whom the assessee had sold shares of Buniyad...

Addition u/s 68 - bogus share capital & share premium - The assessee failed to prove that the transactions of share application money is genuine and the creditworthiness...

Addition u/s 68 - share application money received as unaccounted cash credit - identity and creditworthiness of the share subscribers and genuineness of the transaction...

The Assessing Officer (AO) failed to conduct relevant inquiries regarding the shares held as penny stocks by the assessee in GCM Securities Ltd. The Principal...

Disallowance of loss from trading in penny shares was rejected. The Assessing Officer's finding that the trading loss was not commercially prudent was not accepted. The...

Penalty u/s 271AAB for unexplained cash commission expenses u/s 69C cannot be imposed if the additional income disclosed by the assessee in the return of income is not...

The High Court held that the acquisition of the trademark 'FABINDIA' during the financial year 2006-07 could not be treated as an international transaction within the...

In a case concerning unexplained credit u/s 68, the assessee proved the identity and genuineness of share applicants, although their creditworthiness was questioned. The...

The bogus transactions are a camouflage and dishonest attempt to avoid tax, resulting in addition to the assessee's income. The AO's approach should be well-considered,...

The addition made u/s 68 for bogus share application money receipts was solely based on the statement of an unrelated third party, Shri Pravin Kumar Jain, recorded...

Capital gain vs Business income - The income from share transactions has been rightly assessed as business income, however, Security Transaction tax (STT) has to be...

Quick Updates: