Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2024 Year 2024 This

Penalty u/s 271AAB for unexplained cash commission expenses u/s ...


Unexplained cash expenses can't attract penalty if not corroborated by search evidence.

Case Laws     Income Tax

September 9, 2024

Penalty u/s 271AAB for unexplained cash commission expenses u/s 69C cannot be imposed if the additional income disclosed by the assessee in the return of income is not corroborated with incriminating material found during the search. The onus is on the Assessing Officer to establish a direct link between the additional income disclosed and the incriminating material found during the search. If the assessee discloses additional income without any incriminating material found during the search, penalty u/s 271AAB cannot be levied. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) observed that the Assessing Officer failed to produce any seized material to substantiate the finding of bogus long-term capital gains and unexplained cash transactions. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) and dismissed the Revenue's grounds.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Unexplained cash payments - There is also no evidence to suggest that cash withdrawn from ETLL was unused and kept with the assessee idle though repeatedly withdrawals...

  2. The assessee denied the entries representing unaccounted cash expenditure, stating they were merely MIS reports for discussion purposes, containing approximate project...

  3. The Appellate Tribunal considered unexplained cash deposits during demonetization. The Tribunal noted the assessee's agricultural income and expenses but found...

  4. Addition u/s 69A - cash balance on account of withdrawal from different bank accounts - The mere fact of holding cash for a longer period was not a sufficient ground for...

  5. The ITAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered the penalty u/s 271AAA for unexplained cash found during a search. The AO rejected the assessee's submissions due to lack of...

  6. Unexplained cash found during the search action - AO has not pointed out any unexplained credit in the books of account, any unexplained investment, any unexplained...

  7. This case pertains to the addition made u/s 69A of the Income Tax Act regarding unexplained cash found during a search operation. The assessee produced a cash book to...

  8. This is a case concerning the disallowance of certain expenses termed as "route expenses" by the Assessing Officer (AO) due to lack of proper supporting vouchers. The...

  9. Unexplained investments - There is no positive and credible evidence brought on record by the revenue to establish the allegation of cash payment over and above the...

  10. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The finding of the authorities based on the evidence of the valuer, which was corroborated by the circumstantial evidence - Levy of penalty confirmed - HC

  11. Unexplained expenses u/s 69C - Cash Expenses incurred by the assessee - A fair estimation of disallowance of cash expenses needs to be done in this case. - disallowance...

  12. Addition on account of unexplained money u/s 69A - unaccounted cash - When the cash is found with an assessee, it is the duty of the assessee to prove the source of such...

  13. Cash deposit during demonetization period treated as unexplained cash credit. Assessee's claim of introducing cash as capital in proprietary concern not accepted due to...

  14. Key legal issues and the Tribunal's holdings: Agricultural land sold by assessee situated beyond municipal limits cannot be treated as capital asset u/s 2(14). Addition...

  15. The assessee, a septuagenarian gynecologist with no business income during the year, made cash deposits totaling Rs. 10 lakh in her bank account during demonetization....

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates