Disallowing employer’s contribution to superannuation fund u/s ...

Employer's Superannuation Fund Deduction Denied Due to PCIT's Inaction u/s 36(1)(iv) of Income Tax Act.

September 23, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Disallowing employer’s contribution to superannuation fund u/s 36(1)(iv) - Application filed by the assessee is as long as in 2011 and till date there is no approval by the PCIT despite the assessee filing of necessary evidences and clarifications. It is also a fact that assessee has complied with all the other conditions for claim of deduction except approval which is to be granted by the Department. We see no reason that the assessee cannot claim deduction for the inaction of the PCIT - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowing employer’s contribution to superannuation fund u/s ...

Employer's Superannuation Fund Deduction Denied Due to PCIT's Inaction u/s 36(1)(iv) of Income Tax Act.

September 23, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the following issues: 1. Deduction u/s. 80P(1) r.w.s. 80P(2)(a)(i) - Held that the assessee is not a cooperative bank, making it...

The delayed deposit of employees' share of contributions towards ESIC and EPF by the assessee beyond the due dates prescribed under the respective Acts would constitute...

Allowability of deduction for payment EPF, LWF and ESI after due date - to claim the benefit of deduction u/s 36(1)(va) payment has to be made before the due date...

Disallowance under Sec.36(1)(va) r/w Sec.2(24)(x) - assessee shall not be entitled to deduction of such amount in computing the income referred to in section 28 if such...

Disallowance being payment of Provident Fund and ESI u/s.36(1)(va) - The auditor in the audit report specifies the due date as prescribed u/s. 36(1)(va) of the Act and...

The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal and held that the disallowance of interest expenditure claimed as a deduction against interest income from the partnership firm...

PCIT's view that section 36 allows deduction only for bad and doubtful debts, not for provision on standard assets, was challenged. AR presented case laws allowing...

Disallowance of bad debts as claimed u/s 36(1)(viia) - deduction claimed @10% of aggregate average advances - AO is directed to make relevant enquires and verifications...

The assessee claimed excess deduction u/s 36(1)(viia) for provision for bad and doubtful debts, leading to escapement of income. The Assessing Officer rightly formed the...

Delay in deposit made to the employees Provident fund and ESIC - such sums were not credited by the respective assessee to the employees 'accounts in the relevant fund...

Deduction u/s 36(1) (viia) - section 36(1) (viia) clearly provides for deduction of 7.5 % of the total income and a further deduction of 10 % of the aggregate of...

Deduction u/s 43B / 36(1) - At least with respect to the employee's contributions, which the employer deducts from the salary of the employees, if it is not remitted...

Late payments towards EPF and ESI under section 36(1)(va) - Contribution made prior to filing of the return of income u/s. 139(1) - Addition by way of adjustment while...

Revision u/s 263 - Deduction u/s 36(1)(viii) - Insofar as, the second issue of excess allowances of deduction u/s.36 (1)(vii), the assessment order passed by the AO is...

The provident fund dues, including contributions u/s 7A, interest u/s 7Q, and damages u/s 14 of the EPF Act, are not part of the liquidation estate assets. The EPFO...

Quick Updates: