Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights September 2021 Year 2021 This

Revision u/s 263 - Exemption u/s 11 - If the order of the AO ...


CIT Rightly Orders AO to Reassess Expenditure Allowability u/s 11 Due to Lack of Clear Basis in AO's Order.

September 27, 2021

Case Laws     Income Tax     AT

Revision u/s 263 - Exemption u/s 11 - If the order of the AO does not disclose the basis of his conclusion, then jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act can be ignored. Therefore, the CIT was justified in directing the AO to examine the allowability of these items of expenditure. The assessee is always at liberty to show as to how the material found in the survey was not sufficient to make any additions in the hands of the assessee. We, therefore, confirm the order of the CIT. - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Charitable entity u/s 2(15) denied exemption u/ss 11 and 12 by Assessing Officer (AO) on grounds of conducting exhibitions being commercial in nature. ITAT held no...

  2. Section 263 revision - derivative transactions losses - inadequate inquiry by Assessing Officer (AO). Commissioner of Income Tax (CIT) set aside AO's order for...

  3. Denial of exemption u/s 11(2) was contested due to the trust's failure to file Form No. 10 within the due date specified u/s 139(1) owing to technical issues. The...

  4. Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

  5. Exemption u/s 11 - Deduction u/s 10(23C) - allowability of depreciation - since the AO has failed to examine the claim of the assessee for exemption u/s 10(23C), 11, 12...

  6. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  7. Appealable order before CIT(A) - scope of order passed on the basis of direction given u/s 263, revisionary proceedings - Therefore, for all purposes, the computation of...

  8. In the present case, the Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the expenditure claimed u/s 57(iii) of the Income Tax Act on an ad-hoc basis. The AO did not challenge the...

  9. Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

  10. Revision u/s 263 - Addition u/s 68 - second revisional jurisdiction of Pr. CIT - Whether the AO (called second AO) has not conducted enquiry while framing re-assessment...

  11. Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure...

  12. Addition on account of low GP - cause and effect relationship between the defect found by the AO and the addition made - AO rejected the book results as unreliable, but...

  13. Taxability of unutilized accumulated funds u/s 11(2) as income u/s 11(3) - The CIT(A) upheld the Assessing Officer's decision, which was based on a Section 263 order...

  14. AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

  15. Disallowance of expenditure towards development of property - no supporting bills of expenditure were provided - CIT(A) has allowed on ad hoc basis only 40% of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates