Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights October 2021 Year 2021 This

Extended period of limitation - Method of Valuation - section 4 ...


Court Rules No Evidence of Duty Evasion in Valuation Dispute Under Central Excise Act Sections 4 and 4A.

October 11, 2021

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Extended period of limitation - Method of Valuation - section 4 or section 4A of Central Excise Act or not - there cannot be any reason to hold in the instant case that the appellant’s Kolkata factory, which is owned by the same legal entity, has deliberately resorted to value the goods under Section 4A as against Section 4 of the Act. Further, no evidence has been adduced to show that the appellant has wilfully resorted to value the goods under Section 4A to evade payment of demanded duty amount. - Demand set aside - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Method of Valuation - prototype vehicles - goods cleared from the factory on payment of duty under self invoice on the comparable value of the similar vehicle applying...

  2. Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

  3. The key legal issues and holdings in this case are: 1. Valuation of clinkers transferred by the appellant to their sister concern should be done u/r 4 read with Rule 11...

  4. The case involved the valuation of medicaments for excise duty purposes u/s 4 or 4A of the Central Excise Act, 1944. The issue was whether medicaments supplied to...

  5. Since Appellant were paying the duty utilizing the CENVAT Credit they cannot be charged for contravention of the provisions of Rule 4, 8(1), 8(3) & 8(3A) of the Central...

  6. Method of Valuation - section 4 of Central Excise Act, 1944 or section 4A of Central Excise Act, 1944 - packages of cake mixes manufactured having been affixed with...

  7. Demand of differential Central Excise Duty with interest and penalty - inflating freight charges through their dummy transport unit - The Tribunal affirmed the...

  8. HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

  9. Valuation - inclusion of transportation charges - In the first SCN the value is sought to be determined in terms of Section 4(1)(a) read with Rule 4 and 5 of Central...

  10. Method of valuation - section 4 or 4A of CEA - Packaged Drinking Water - MRP based valuation - The CESTAT determined that packaged drinking water should not be...

  11. Method of valuation - Rule 11 is adopted when the situation is not covered by any of the other methods of valuation prescribed from Rule 4 to 10A. The method of...

  12. Valuation - Section 4 or 4A - manufacture of Powder Hair Dye (PHD) - whether the appellant is required to print/affix MRP on sachets and/or on the mono pack containing...

  13. Extension of the permission for storing the finished goods outside the factory premises as per the provisions of Rule 4(4) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Revenue’s...

  14. 100% EOU - DTA clearance - Valuation of goods Rule 4 or under Rule 7 of the Customs Valuation Rules, 1988 - if Rule 4 is not applicable, the valuation of the goods has...

  15. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates