Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - ...

DCIT's Jurisdiction Invalid: Failed to Issue Section 143(2) Notice Timely for 2015-16 Assessment Year, Procedural Flaw Found.

November 1, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - Admittedly, when the ITO realized that he did not had the pecuniary jurisdiction to issue notice, he duly transferred the file to the DCIT, Circle-4, Guwahati, when the DCIT issued notice u/s 142(1) of the Act and did not issue notice u/s 143(2) of the Act within the time limit prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act for the assessment year 2015-16. We note that the DCIT by assuming the jurisdiction after the time prescribed for issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) of the Act notice became coarum non judice after the limitation prescribed by the statute was crossed by him. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Jurisdiction of the AO to frame the assessment order - ...

DCIT's Jurisdiction Invalid: Failed to Issue Section 143(2) Notice Timely for 2015-16 Assessment Year, Procedural Flaw Found.

November 1, 2021

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

Validity of assessment - no notice u/s 143(2) - the assessment order passed by the Assessing Officer (DCIT) was bad in law for want of issuance of notice u/s 143(2) of...

Validity of notice u/s 143(2) - scrutiny assessment - issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) by correct AO - As per CBDT instruction the scrutiny noticemust be issued by the...

The HC held that the Jurisdictional Assessment Officer (JAO) has exclusive jurisdiction to issue notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act. For assessment, re-assessment or...

Notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional Assessing Officer/Deputy Commissioner is invalid and cannot be cured. The assessment order framed u/s 143(3) based on...

ITAT quashed assessment order due to jurisdictional defect in notice issuance under Section 143(2). While ACIT had pecuniary jurisdiction to conduct assessment of...

The High Court examined the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer (AO) and the prescribed income-tax authority to issue notices u/s 143(2) of the Income Tax Act. It held...

Validity of the issuance of notice u/s. 143(2) - Scope of proper service of notice - notice u/s. 143(2) served through affixture - Since in the instant case, the notice...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that the reassessment notices issued u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act for the assessment years 2013-14, 2014-15, and 2015-16...

ITAT invalidated reassessment proceedings due to jurisdictional defects in notice issuance under s.148. ITO Ward 3(2), Bulandsahar transferred assessee's records to ITO...

The jurisdictional Assessing Officer (AO) had suo moto transferred the assessment to Income Tax Officer (ITO), Ward 2(2) Noida. The appellant contended that the...

Amendments/Corrections in Table 2 of Appendix 3B Foreign Trade Policy 2015-20 - Public Notice

The Appellate Tribunal addressed the issue of notice u/s 143(2) issued by a non-jurisdictional AO. The initial notice was issued by an ITO who did not have valid...

The ITAT held that the limitation period for issuing a notice u/s 143(2) is relevant to the financial year and assessment year. When the Assessing Officer considered the...

Validity of assessment order - Transfer of case from jurisdiction - Notice u/s 143(2) was issued by the ITO Ward-2, Malegaon, Nasik, Maharashtra whereas Assessment order...

This case involves a challenge to an order of re-assessment under the relevant tax laws. The key points are: The petitioner failed to submit monthly returns within the...

Quick Updates: