Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2021 Year 2021 This

Exit order in terms of Rule 74 of the Special Economic Zone ...


Rule 74 SEZ Rules: Exit Orders Don't Require Hearing for Co-Developers; Petitioner Can't Contest Orders P10, P11.

November 10, 2021

Case Laws     Customs     HC

Exit order in terms of Rule 74 of the Special Economic Zone Rules, 2006 - There is nothing in Rule 74 or in the Act 2005, which will give an opportunity of hearing to a co-developer while considering an application for exit order. The short point raised by the petitioner is that the prayer of the 4th respondent is not for getting an exit order. - If there is any grievance to the petitioner regarding the arrears of rent, the petitioner is free to agitate the same in accordance to law, before the appropriate authority. But the petitioner cannot challenge Exts.P10 and P11 order, which according to me, is only an exit order and the co-developer of the 4th respondent has no role in it. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Provision of facilities/amenities by units under Rule 11(5) of the SEZ Rules

  2. Special Economic Zones (Amendment) Rules, 2018 - SEZ Rules has been amended substantially

  3. CENVAT Credit - duty paying invoices - performa invoices - the documents required under the Rule 9 are not confined to merely invoices but these may be any documents,...

  4. Rule 6 of the Cenvat Credit Rules,2004 – Clearance of goods to SEZ - The substituted sub-rule 6(6Xi) is enforced from the date the 2004-Rules came into force - AT

  5. Anti-Profiteering - Order of the Authority - Rule 133 of the CGST Rules, 2017 as amended.

  6. Validity of intimation of tax ascertained u/s 74(1),(5) - Threat of recovery - There is a vast difference between Rule 142(1)(a) and Rule 142 (1A) of the Rules....

  7. Clarification on execution of Bond Undertaking by the SEZ Developer or SEZ Unit in terms of rule 22(1 )(iv) of the SEZ Rules, 2006.

  8. HC upheld validity of Rule 36(4) of CGST Rules, dismissing constitutional challenge. Court determined Rule 36(4) derives authority from Section 16 of CGST Act and...

  9. Undervaluation of goods - FOS and Sucralose when cleared to related parties and M/s Surya Herbals by not following CAS-4 valuation method as provided u/r 8 of Central...

  10. Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - the AO has not computed any disallowance under Rule 8D(2)(i) and Rule 8D(2)(ii) of the Rules and only under Rule 8D(2)(iii) of...

  11. Safe Harbour Rule - Income-tax (18th Amendment) Rules, 2022 - Amends Rule 10TD - Notification

  12. Compliance with rule 3A by certain Nidhis - Rule 23A of the Nidhi Rules, 2014 - As amended

  13. CENVAT credit - goods cleared to SEZ unit - Rule 6(6) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 - the amendment carried out in Rule 6(6) by way of Notification No.50/2008 was retrospective.

  14. The adjudicating authority is bound to explain the alleged contraventions to the person proceeded against or their legal representatives. Rule 4(4) mandates...

  15. National Financial Reporting Authority (Amendment) Rules, 2019 - Rule 2, Rule 3, Rule 5 and Rule 11 amended.

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates