Clandestine removal - IMT Bars - Area based exemption - Though ...

Appellant's Duty Payment Post-Violation of Notification No. 39/2001-CE Doesn't Allow Reclaim; Misdeclaration Confirmed.

December 3, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Clandestine removal - IMT Bars - Area based exemption - Though the appellant subsequently paid duty but at time of clearance they have mis-declared and cleared the goods clandestinely. Therefore, the appellant has clearly contravened the condition stipulated under the Notification No. 39/2001- CE. Therefore the re credit of the duty paid subsequently is not admissible to the appellant. - The appellants plea that there is no suppression of fact in the present case is of no help to them - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Clandestine removal - IMT Bars - Area based exemption - Though ...

Appellant's Duty Payment Post-Violation of Notification No. 39/2001-CE Doesn't Allow Reclaim; Misdeclaration Confirmed.

December 3, 2021

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

ITAT determined that excise duty refund received under Notification No.39/2001 Central Excise, issued as part of earthquake relief incentive scheme for Kutch District,...

Seeks to amend Notification No. 45/2001 - CE (NT) dated 26th June, 2001, as amended, to allow export of material/equipment under bond, without payment of Central Excise...

Duty demand of Rs.15,19,610/- confirmed. Original demand of Rs.2,54,01,776/- not accepted. Appellant failed to counter Commissioner's observations on Annexures II, III,...

Export of goods procured against CT-1 certificate after processing and not in the same condition - benefit of Notification No. 42/2001 CE(NT) dated 26.06.2001 allowed - AT

Area Based exemption - Units in Kutch District of Gujarat - since the appellant have strictly followed the conditions of the notification no 39/2001-CE particularly...

Procurement of inputs without payment of duty - export of exempted goods - when such Annexure 1 certificate continued to be live and are not cancelled or declared void...

Area based exemption - Notification No. 39/2001-CE - not only Education/SHE Cesses are ineligible to cash refund but also it will not be correct to say that the entire...

Manufacturing of Windmill doors - The notification No.3/2001-CE & No.6/2002-CE provides exemption from payment of Central Excise duty in respect of wind operated...

Denial of exemption benefits under Notifications 30/2004-CE and 23/2003-CE for clearances of finished goods into the Domestic Tariff Area (DTA) by a 100% Export Oriented...

Nature of Duty Paid by 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) - The CESTAT held that while the measure adopted for computing duty paid by 100% EOUs may be based on customs...

Compounding scheme - Aluminum Circles - the appellant is entitled to the compounding facility under N/N. 34/2001-CE, and they have rightly paid the duty - the appellants...

The appellant is entitled to the benefit of notification no. 6/2002-CE and notification no. 6/2006 CE. The appellant reversed the Cenvat Credit attributable to the goods...

CESTAT upheld the demand for central excise duty, interest, and penalties against the appellant who contravened Notification No. 42/2001-CE and Excise Rule 19. The...

Refund claim of excess Central Excise duty paid - Effective date of notification - the Notification were not offered for sale by the Directorate of Publicity and were...

The High Court correctly distinguished between the jurisdiction vested in every person or public office and the District Registrar in determining penalty on...

Quick Updates: