CESTAT upheld the demand for central excise duty, interest, and ...

Manufacturer Faces Excise Duty Penalties After Failing to Prove Exports Under Rule 19 and Notification 42/2001-CE

March 8, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

CESTAT upheld the demand for central excise duty, interest, and penalties against the appellant who contravened Notification No. 42/2001-CE and Excise Rule 19. The appellant had obtained CT-1 Certificates and removed goods without duty payment under two ARE-1 forms but failed to submit required documentation proving export. Instead of exporting the goods, the appellant sold them domestically to CEL. The Tribunal emphasized that Excise Rule 19 specifically requires evidence that goods removed from a factory must be exported, not merely sold domestically to parties who might eventually export them. As the appellant failed to follow prescribed export procedures, the appeal was dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

CESTAT upheld the demand for central excise duty, interest, and ...

Manufacturer Faces Excise Duty Penalties After Failing to Prove Exports Under Rule 19 and Notification 42/2001-CE

March 8, 2025

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Recovery of rebate of duty - eligibility to claim rebate on portion pertaining to special packing done overseas - excess payment of duty on additional protective packing...

Reversal of Cenvat Credit - Scope of exemption notification - Notification exempting the basic excuse duty but not additional duty of excise - As per Rule 2(d),...

Remission of duty - Rejection of petitioner’s application for remission of excise duty - export goods that got destroyed in fire at the Container Warehousing Corporation...

Reversal of CENVAT Credit - the object of both the provisions is clear and the only difference is that Chapter X uses the word “remission” of duty on excisable goods”...

Imposition of personal penalty on two Directors - valuation of goods - In any event, excise is a levy on manufacture and it is found that it is not the case of the...

Refund of Excise Duty in cash - What the assessee suggests is that the Cenvat credit given for acquisition of capital goods to a manufacturer, who is otherwise exempted...

Seeks to prescribe rates of Special Additional Excise Duty for exports of petrol and diesel - Notification

Levy of excise duty and NCCD under the Central Excise Act, 1944 - It is pertinent to note that in the writ petition, there are no pleadings that action of levy of excise...

HC reversed CESTAT's ruling on concessional duty benefits for cement imports. Importer violated notification conditions by purchasing cement through high-sea trade from...

This case deals with the applicability of Special Additional Excise Duty (SAED) levied u/s 147 of the Finance Act, 2002, and Additional Duty of Excise (AED) levied as...

Nature of Duty Paid by 100% Export Oriented Units (EOU) - The CESTAT held that while the measure adopted for computing duty paid by 100% EOUs may be based on customs...

CENVAT Credit – Penalty on dealer who issued excise invoice was not registered under central excise - penalty cannot be imposed on such dealer - credit denied to the...

Liability to duty - principal manufacturer or job worker - the principal manufacturer i.e. who furnished the undertaking under notification 83/94 and 84/94 is liable to duty - AT

This notification amends the previous Notification No. 18/2022-Central Excise to reduce the Special Additional Excise Duty on production of Petroleum Crude to nil per...

The Ministry of Finance, u/s 5A of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has issued Notification No. 16/2024-Central Excise on 14th June, 2024, amending No. 18/2022-Central...

Quick Updates: