Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2022 Year 2022 This

Clandestine removal - CTD/TMT bars - provisions of Section 9D of ...


Court Overturns Order Due to Non-Compliance with Section 9D; Case Remanded for Rehearing with Proper Procedures.

January 7, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Clandestine removal - CTD/TMT bars - provisions of Section 9D of the Central Excise Act have not been followed - Although in the instant case, opportunities were granted by the adjudicating authority to the appellant but they chose not to participate in the proceeding - When the legislature has laid down a procedure to be followed then it has to be done in that way only and no shortcut can be adopted. Therefore on this ground alone, without going into the merits of the matter, it is deemed proper to set aside the impugned order and remand the matter back to the adjudicating authority for de novo adjudication after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Cancellation of petitioner's registration due to alleged fraud, willful misstatement, or suppression of facts in obtaining registration. Proper Officer issued show cause...

  2. The High Court addressed an issue u/s 73 (9) of the WBGST & CGST Act, 2017 regarding an error in reporting Input Tax Credit on Import of Goods. The court found a...

  3. DSC examined judicial remand application under Sec 167 CrPC and Sec 187 BNSS Act. While arrest grounds were properly documented with accused's acknowledgment, the court...

  4. The High Court addressed the valuation of goods for calculating Integrated Goods and Services Tax (IGST) refund. The court held that the rules do not specify considering...

  5. Limited jurisdiction of trial court after remand order; cannot enlarge scope beyond remand directions. Trial court erred in allowing evidence beyond remand's limited...

  6. CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, addressed the valuation of imported goods (ball valves/check valves/cartridges of brass). The rejection of declared value and...

  7. The High Court addressed two issues: disallowance of deduction u/s 10B and non-compliance with Section 153C procedure. Regarding Section 10B, the Court upheld the...

  8. Jurisdiction of CMM (MEERUT)(UP) - Investigation were conducted at Gaziabad (UP) by the DGGI - all Firms/Companies which are said to be of accused, are registered in New...

  9. The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three...

  10. The High Court dealt with a case involving the rejection of a refund claim due to discrepancies between the petitioner's GSTR 1 statement and GSTR 3B return. The Court...

  11. Validity of Reopening of assessment - proceedings drawn u/s 148A commenced by the local jurisdictional officer - non adherence to procedure of faceless regime for the...

  12. Period of limitation to pass assessment order in case of remand proceedings u/s 153 - An order of any Court means an order of any and every Court of the country. - The...

  13. Reopening of assessment under old regime - scope of new regime - scope of TOLA - In this detailed judgement, the Court found that the notice issued under Section 148 was...

  14. Application for settlement of cases u/s 245C - Writ petition was pending when the Settlement Commission was abolished and Interim Board was brought into operation. This...

  15. The HC quashed adjudication orders passed under s.74 of the Jharkhand GST Act, 2017, as they were issued without granting the petitioner an opportunity for personal...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates