The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to ...

Abatement of appeal due to non-prosecution beyond three adjournments. Upheld based on Ishwar lal Mali Rathod case.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 6, 2024

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to abatement caused by non-prosecution of the case. The Tribunal held that adjourning a matter beyond three times, as seen in a Supreme Court case, is unjustified. The Supreme Court condemned the practice of mechanical adjournments. In this case, despite multiple adjournments and warnings, the appellant did not avail of the opportunities granted. The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution, in line with Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982.

View Source

← Previous Next →

The CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, dismissed an appeal due to ...

Abatement of appeal due to non-prosecution beyond three adjournments. Upheld based on Ishwar lal Mali Rathod case.

Case Laws Central Excise

June 6, 2024

You may also like:

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Request for adjournment, which cannot be accepted in virtual hearing - The case involved repeated requests for...

CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed an appeal due to abatement for adjourning the matter beyond three times, citing Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982. Referring to...

Power of adjournment - giving a choice of three dates for personal hearing in one letter and seeking of adjournment by the appellant by one month, would not amount to...

Scope of adjournment of matter beyond three times - Rule 20 of CESTAT Procedure Rules, 1982 - The Tribunal dismisses the appeal due to the appellant's non-prosecution,...

The High Court held that prosecution u/ss 276C, 277, 278B, and 278E for tax evasion was invalid as it violated CBDT guidelines. Prosecution was premature without the...

Ex-parte order rejecting the repetitive adjournments - The petitioners had no right to seek unlimited adjournments nor seek adjournment without any basis. - HC

Maintainability of appeal - non-prosecution of the case - Matter has been listed quite a number of times in the past and appellant has been abstaining from attending the...

Disallowance of commission paid to foreign agents - The Tribunal upheld the disallowance of commission expenses to both domestic and non-resident companies due to the...

Transfer pricing issues: Royalty arrangement including trademark, know-how upheld based on CUP method over TNMM. Advertisement expenses remanded for fresh determination....

Dismissal of the appeal by CIT(Appeals) for non-prosecution - The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision due to the assessee's failure to respond to multiple hearing notices...

Validity of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(b) - non-compliance - The assessee has shown sufficient cause for non-compliance, moreover, such non-compliance was done by...

Clandestine removal - MS Ingots - the findings of clandestine removal cannot be upheld based upon the third party documents, unless there is clinching evidence of...

Initiation of prosecution - Penalty upheld by ITAT - substantial question of law relating to penalty u/s 271(1)(c) pending before High Court - at this stage, there would...

The respondent denied Input Tax Credit (ITC) to the petitioner based on alleged purchase of goods under HSN 85171110, non-payment to creditors exceeding 180 days, and...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

Quick Updates: