Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
IBC - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights January 2022 Year 2022 This

Determination of insolvency resolution costs - payments of costs ...


Supreme Court Remands Case Due to Inadequate Evaluation of Insolvency Resolution Costs by NCLT and Appellate Authority.

January 8, 2022

Case Laws     Insolvency and Bankruptcy     SC

Determination of insolvency resolution costs - payments of costs and expenses incurred by the Resolution Professional (RP) - Neither the basis of the claim nor its reasonableness has been considered by the adjudicating authority. The appellate authority has merely proceeded in an ad hoc manner on the ground that the amount of ₹ 5,00,000 as fee, in addition to the expenses, appears to be reasonable. - In the absence of any reasons either in the order of the NCLT or the appellate authority, it is impossible for the Court to deduce the basis on which the payment of an amount of ₹ 5,00,000 together with expenses has been found to be reasonable. Consequently, an order of remand becomes necessary. - SC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Scope of NCLT Rules - fees mentioned in Rule 112 read with the definition clause 2(12) does not mention either CIRP costs or the fees to be paid to the IRP or RP. The...

  2. The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

  3. Seeking direction to RP to disclose item wise insolvency resolution process costs - The Appellant asked Resolution Professional to disclose item wise insolvency...

  4. CIRP Proceedings under IBC versus Tax Dues / Statutory Dues - The High court noted that NCLT should have been cautious before approving the Corporate Insolvency...

  5. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) held that the Resolution Plan must provide for payment of Provident Fund and Gratuity dues in accordance with Section...

  6. Once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan remain payable. This...

  7. The High Court examined the issue of liability to clear statutory dues post-insolvency proceedings under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016. The resolution plan...

  8. The judgment addresses the applicability of Section 31 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) concerning the recovery of tax dues from the successful resolution...

  9. The NCLAT held that the requirement of obtaining a No Objection Certificate (NOC) from stock exchanges under Regulation 37(1) and (2) of the LODR (Listing Obligations...

  10. The appellant's claim for Rs. 9.21 crores, arising from the termination of an agreement due to non-renewal of a performance bank guarantee, was not considered by the...

  11. CESTAT (Appellate Tribunal) addressed whether appeals continue post initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) and approval of Resolution plan u/s...

  12. The High Court held that once a resolution plan is approved u/s 31(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), only the debts specified in the resolution plan...

  13. External Commercial Borrowings (ECB) Policy – ECB facility for Resolution Applicants under Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process

  14. Resolution professional doesn’t require nod of shareholders/members for insolvency resolution

  15. Recovery of excise duty, which got extinguished on approval of resolution plan - Section 31(1) of the IBC, 2016 mandates that the resolution plan approved by the NCLT...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates