Seeking refund of deposit - the amount is deposit or duty? - ...

Refund Request Denied: Amount Classified as Duty, Not Deposit, u/s 27 of the Customs Act 1962.

January 15, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

Seeking refund of deposit - the amount is deposit or duty? - refund of security deposit during provisional assessment - Since in view of the documentary evidence, it is established that the amount for which refund was sought for by the appellant is not a deposit but it is a duty. Therefore, the refund is clearly governed by Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962 therefore, all the provision of limitation and unjust enrichment, etc is clearly applicable. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Seeking refund of deposit - the amount is deposit or duty? - ...

Refund Request Denied: Amount Classified as Duty, Not Deposit, u/s 27 of the Customs Act 1962.

January 15, 2022

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

Rejection of refund claim - Period of limitation - These admitted facts are sufficient admission to the fact that the goods were never cleared for home consumption....

HC held that Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) does not constitute customs duty under Section 27 of Customs Act, 1962, but rather functions as a security deposit as clarified in...

Denial of refund claim - Refund of extra duty deposit - Applicability of Section 27 - extra duty deposit appears to be more in the form of a security and not in the...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Rejection of refund of cash security deposit - Period of limitation - it is very much clear that refund claim of the security deposit is not governed by the provisions...

Refund claim was rejected as time-barred, having been filed beyond the one-year limitation period stipulated u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellant had...

Refund claim for amount deposited in PLA, whether duty or not, subject to time limitation u/s 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944. Held that Apex court in Modipon Ltd. case...

The period of limitation of one year does not apply when the amount claimed as refund has been paid under protest. Section 27 of the Customs Act, 1962, only recognizes...

The CESTAT held that interest on delayed refund of Anti-Dumping Duty deposited during investigation is payable from the date of filing refund application, not from...

The case involved a dispute over the refund of a cash security deposit u/s 27 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal held that the rejection of the refund on...

The High Court held that the rejection of refund claim for Extra Duty Deposit (EDD) paid by the petitioner was unjustified. The EDD amount collected during Special...

Refund of duty paid during investigation - amount paid as pre-deposit or the amount paid during investigation cannot be considered as duty. For refund of such...

The case pertains to the interpretation of amended provisions of Sections 35F and 35FF of the Central Excise Act, 1944, regarding eligibility for interest on pre-deposit...

Refund - Amount deposited during proceedings before the Settlement Commission - Period of time limitation - In this case the amounts have not been appropriated and...

Quick Updates: