Disallowance of telephone expenses - expenses have been incurred ...

Partners' Telephone Expenses for Business Allowed as Deduction u/s 37(1); Disallowance Deleted.

February 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Disallowance of telephone expenses - expenses have been incurred by the partners of the assessee for the purpose of business - Copies of all the orders of the proceeding years as well as subsequent year have already been placed on record and after going through these orders as well as facts of the present case, we found that no disallowance was called for on telephone expenses and the assessee is entitled to said deduction U/s 37(1) of the Act, accordingly, we direct to delete the same. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowance of telephone expenses - expenses have been incurred ...

Partners' Telephone Expenses for Business Allowed as Deduction u/s 37(1); Disallowance Deleted.

February 3, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

ITAT ruled against disallowance of transportation expenses, finding the Assessing Officer failed to establish statutory grounds u/s 37 for rejection. The tribunal...

Disallowance of sales promotion expenses being gifts to doctors and hospitals - Allowable business expenditure u/s 37(1) - the MCA regulations are applicable to the...

Expenses under the head research and development - deduction of such expenses under the provisions of section 37(1) OR u/s 35 - the genuineness of the expenses cannot be...

The Tribunal held that based on the financial parameters and risk profile, the assessee qualifies as a developer rather than merely a contractor u/s 80IA of the Income...

Allowability of deduction u/s 37(1) of the Act - Amount of service tax included with interest – expenses have direct nexus with the business operation - expense allowed - HC

The assessee claimed deduction for interest and late fees paid on account of delay in filing GST returns. The authorities disallowed the claim, invoking Explanation 1 to...

Disallowance of expenses made u/s.37(1) - disallowance of expenditure on adhoc basis made by the ld. AO by giving a categorical finding that the ld. AO had not even...

Payment made for surrender of tenancy rights - deduction allowed u/s 37(1) - AT

The Appellate Tribunal addressed several issues: 1. Disallowance of Brand Ambassador Expenses - AO disallowed 75% as capital expenditure, but CIT(A) found it to be...

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

The ITAT partly allowed the assessee's appeal. Travel expenses were partly disallowed by 30% considering personal element, while 70% were allowed as business expenses...

Key legal principles and decisions related to various disallowances and additions made by the Assessing Officer (AO) under different sections of the Income Tax Act. The...

The ITAT ruled that professional fees paid for drafting patent applications constitute revenue expenditure deductible under s.37(1) as they were incurred in the regular...

Business expenditure u/s.37(1) - share issue expenses - assessee has abandoned the proposal to issue shares at later stage - when the nature of expenditure incurred by...

Various issues related to allowability of expenses, deductions, transfer pricing adjustments, and other income tax matters for a pharmaceutical company. Key points are:...

Quick Updates: