Disallowing interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - CIT(A) allowed the claim ...

CIT(A) Upholds Interest Disallowance Claim; AO Can't Reopen Past Cases or Assume CIT Jurisdiction u/s 263.

March 9, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

Disallowing interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - CIT(A) allowed the claim - AO is drawing adverse inference that assessee has not submitted the utilization of the overdraft in the earlier years. We note that this is not the case, where AO has any power to reopen the case of earlier years or that the AO has stepped into the shoes of ld. CIT and is exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 and that also for earlier year. No cogent rebuttal has been given on behalf of the revenue against the finding given by ld. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Disallowing interest u/s. 36(1)(iii) - CIT(A) allowed the claim ...

CIT(A) Upholds Interest Disallowance Claim; AO Can't Reopen Past Cases or Assume CIT Jurisdiction u/s 263.

March 9, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax AT

You may also like:

The ITAT addressed various issues including disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r.8D, where Revenue challenged deletion of disallowance made by AO. ITAT upheld CIT(A)'s decision,...

The assessee, a university, claimed exemption u/s 10(23C)(iiiab) for the relevant assessment year, which was accepted by the Assessing Officer (AO) after considering the...

Revision u/s 263 involving excess deduction of transport expenses and non-deduction of TDS on transportation charges. CIT held AO failed to verify adequately, rendering...

Revision u/s 263 - as per CIT AO had wrongly allowed the assessee exemption of capital gains claimed u/s 54B - Tribunal found that neither any inquiry was made by the AO...

Penalty levied u/s 274 read with Section 270A - assessee computed tax on disallowed depreciation amount at maximum marginal rate and levied 200% penalty on payable tax -...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - time to initiate Revision u/s 263 was not left - Reopening is made at the direction of the ld. CIT. The ld. CIT when he did not find...

u/s 263, the AO had not made any addition regarding cash deposits in the assessee company's bank account and unsecured loan received during the year under consideration,...

The case pertains to the validity of reopening of assessment by the Assessing Officer (AO) and the characterization of short-term capital gains (STCG) from the sale of...

Revision u/s 263 - For the purpose of exercising jurisdiction u/s 263 of the Act, the conclusion that the order of the AO is erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of...

The assessment order was passed without verifying the allowability of the cost of improvement as per Section 55(1)(b)(2), rendering it erroneous and prejudicial to...

Revision u/s 263 - The Pr. CIT while passing the order u/s 263 cannot remand the matter back to the AO for passing the fresh order as it will lead to the conclusion that...

AO failed to conduct proper inquiries regarding genuineness of loan transactions for property acquisition. Bank statements revealed assessee lacked funds, payments made...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case involving a revision u/s 263 related to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i). The AO allowed interest income from FD investments as a...

Quick Updates: