Classification of services - business auxiliary services or not ...

Court Rules Toll Services Not Business Auxiliary; Circular No.152/3/2012 Misapplied, Appellant Pays NHAI Weekly.

April 8, 2022

Case Laws Service Tax AT

Classification of services - business auxiliary services or not - Toll Charges - Applicability of Circular No.152/3/2012 - No fixed amount has been retained by the Appellant, on the contrary, he is required to pay a fixed amount on weekly basis to NHAI. Thus, consideration is flowing from the Appellant to NHAI and not vice-versa. Therefore, the said circular is not applicable in the scenario and the department has erred in applying the circular in the present case. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Classification of services - business auxiliary services or not ...

Court Rules Toll Services Not Business Auxiliary; Circular No.152/3/2012 Misapplied, Appellant Pays NHAI Weekly.

April 8, 2022

Case Laws Service Tax AT

You may also like:

Insurance Auxiliary Services - brokerage received from overseas reinsurance - Export of service or not - Non receipt of consideration in foreign exchange - the basis of...

Import / Export of services - with effect from 20/06/2012 a specific Rule has been prescribed called Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. Though these Rules are...

Export of services - place of supply - The position becomes learer in the post July 2012 period during which the POPS Rules 2012 apply. - Provision of telecommunication...

Levy of service tax - Business Auxiliary Service or not - The appellant is neither related to import of goods nor any sale of goods and also nor concern with the payment...

The CESTAT held that the appellant's services could not be classified as intermediary services for the period July 2012 to March 2014. As per Rule 3 of the Place of...

Toll in the nature of ‘user charge’ or ‘access fee’ paid by roads users - regarding. - Cir. No. 152/3 /2012-ST Dated: February 22, 2012

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

CESTAT allowed appeal concerning service tax on payments made by appellant to overseas logistics agents. Tribunal held that pre-April 2006 demand of Rs. 11,97,047 was...

Business Auxiliary Services - business of toll collection - if NHAI engages somebody else to collect toll charges on its behalf and pays them remuneration, the service...

Refund claim of service tax paid on cancelled transactions - Post GST era - Rejection of refund under Rule 6(3) of Service Tax Rules read with Sec 142(5) of CGST Act -...

Refund claim rejected by adjudicating authority on grounds that services provided by appellant to SOLCIL did not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-ST...

Place of provision of services - The appellant are not intermediaries in terms of Rule 2(f) of the Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. Therefore, the appellants...

Order - DVAT Rules, 2005 - Extension of time limit prescribed in sub-rule (4) of Rule 26 - Cir. No. F.3(277)/Policy/VAT/2012/30-40 Dated: April 19, 2012

CESTAT ALLAHABAD held that the Appellant is entitled to benefit u/s Rule 6(3A) of CCR, 2004 even if the option wasn't initially exercised. Service tax on logistic...

The appellant performed clinical study services in India on drugs supplied by their foreign client and delivered the clinical study report through email, courier, or...

Quick Updates: