Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Central Excise - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2022 Year 2022 This

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in ...


Penalty u/r 26 Not Dependent on Actual Confiscation; Awareness and Evasion Support Liability for Personal Penalty.

June 18, 2022

Case Laws     Central Excise     AT

Levy of penalty u/r 26 - Personal penalty for abatement in evasion of duty - a plain reading of Rule 26 indicates that imposition of the penalty therein is not tied to a condition that excisable goods have to be placed under confiscation under the Act/Rules - Only, the person implicated/concerned should have the knowledge of “possible confiscation” of the impugned goods. From the facts on record, the appellant have played crucial role in commission of offence by the manufacturer. Appellant is liable to penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules.- AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Levy of penalty in the absence of confiscation - penalty under Rule 26 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 even in case where there is no proposal for confiscation can be...

  2. Penalty u/r 26(1) of Central Excise Rules, 2002 - charge of abating the evasion of duty by the Main Party - The appellant argued that since the main party's case of duty...

  3. Levy of penalty - the penalty under Section 26 is inextricably linked to the confiscation of goods as long as there is no confiscation of the goods ordered that there...

  4. Clandestine removal of excisable goods - Penalty u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 imposed on Managing Director. Appellant challenged Order upholding penalty without...

  5. Confiscation - importer - the definition of 'importer' under Section 2 (26) of the Customs Act, 1962 - AT

  6. Penalty imposed u/r 26 of Central Excise Rules 2002 set aside due to violation of principles of natural justice and lack of evidence. Department's case based solely on...

  7. The case involved the scope for retention of penalty u/s 112 of Customs Act, 1962 after liability to confiscation was set aside. Confiscation pertains to goods, while...

  8. Recovery of differential duty (SAD) u/s 28(1) of CA for the imports made in all the Bills of Entry along with interest and penalties - The Tribunal confirmed the...

  9. Penalty under rule 26 of the CER, 2002 can be imposed on a person only when it is proved beyond doubt that the person dealing with excisable goods knew or had reason to...

  10. Imposition of penalty under Rule 26 (2) of CER - availment of irregular CENVAT Credit - invoices without actual receipt of inputs - Though the opting of SVLDRS should...

  11. Penalty - Confiscation of foriegn currency - carrying currency in excess of prescribed limit - penalty reduced - AT

  12. Penalty under Rule 26 and u/s 11AC - Personal penalty on Director, transporter and other persons - Clandestine manufacture and clearance of goods - levy of penalty...

  13. Penalty u/r 25 or 26 of CER - Mentioning wrong rule number - The first appellate authority was not correct in holding that mentioning Rule 25 was a typographical error...

  14. Imposition of penalty - Issue of bogus invoices - Penalty under Rule 26, whether under sub-Rule (1) of Rule 26 or under sub-Rule (2) of Rule 26 can be imposed on a...

  15. Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear that unless and until there is sufficient evidence about the mens area/ intent on the part of the...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates