Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 22, 2021

Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear that unless and until there is sufficient evidence about the mens area/ intent on the part of the appellant which prove that he knew or had reason to believe that excisable goods with which he is involved, he is transporting, removing, depositing, keeping, concealing, selling or purchasing, or in any other manner dealing with such excisable goods, are liable for confiscation, he cannot be penalised under Rule 26. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty - Perusal of Rule 26 makes it abundantly clear ...

Case Laws Central Excise

June 22, 2021

You may also like:

Compounding of offence - Unless and until a reference is made to the Tribunal, unless and until the Tribunal declares contravention of requirements of Schedule XIII and...

Penalty levied under 271(1)(c) - The revenue has tried to make out a case that since the addition was made pursuant to information from sales tax department, this...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - Penalty order did not specify the particular limb under which penalty u/s 271(1)(c) is levied. AO has not specified that penalty is either levied...

The ITAT Mumbai ruled on penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for estimation of income on bogus purchases. The tribunal held that penalty cannot be levied on additions made on an...

MAT is paid, additions were made to regular income, penalty not levied – 115JB, 271(1)(c)

Levy of penalty on Custodian - providing Inland transportation of containers - CONCOR - As per section 45, the custodian is burdened with the responsibility of safe...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) on addition made u/s 68 - the assessee has given sufficient explanation though not found satisfactory by AO - No merit in levying penalty.

Penalty u/s 271D - violation of provisions u/s 269SS - cash receipt claimed as advance against sales - recording of the satisfaction by the AO is sine qua non for...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the levy of penalty u/s 270A. The Assessing Officer (AO) imposed the penalty u/s 270A(9)(a) for misrepresentation of facts and...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the appellant, during reassessment proceedings, had filed their return of income but failed to provide...

Clandestine Removal - Levy of penalty - If on the basis of the evidences adduced which would be of the nature as enumerated at (ii) of para 40 of the said decision, the...

Penalty u/s 27(1)(c) - addition u/s 68/69 for cash deposit in bank account - penalty has been initiated on the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars, but Ld.AO...

Violation of principles of natural justice - Thus, it is clear that by means of the last so-called III Opportunity of hearing, the petitioner was granted only a short...

Levy of penalty u/s 158BFA(2) - penalty has been levied on the amount of undisclosed income without providing any working of maximum and minimum penalty leviable - No penalty - AT

Levy of penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) - The failure of the Assessing Officer to record such satisfaction makes the order levying penalty invalid and bad in law and such...

Quick Updates: