Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed ...

Construction Firm Fails to Pass Input Tax Credit Benefits to Buyers; Profiteering Amount Set at Rs. 1,07,67,330.

August 8, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) - The Authority finds that, had the Respondent excluded the land value from the demand raised to his buyers, the value of land would have been excluded from the preview of profiteering. Therefore, the Authority finds that the facts or the cases relied upon by the Respondent are different from the present case. Hence, the Authority finds that this contention of the Respondent regarding exclusion of land value being untenable cannot be accepted. - the Authority determines the profiteered amount for the period from 01.07.2017 to 30.09.2019, in the instant case, as Rs.1,07,67,330/- for the project 'MJR Clique Hydra'. - NAPA

View Source

← Previous Next →

Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed ...

Construction Firm Fails to Pass Input Tax Credit Benefits to Buyers; Profiteering Amount Set at Rs. 1,07,67,330.

August 8, 2022

Case Laws GST NAPA

You may also like:

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by him by way of commensurate reduction...

Profiteering - benefit of additional input tax credit had not been passed on to the home buyers or not - period from July 2017 to September, 2020 - As project was...

Anti-profiteering - Failure to pass on the benefit of Input tax credit - Construction service - assessee directed to reduce the price to be realized from the buyers of...

Profiteering - purchase of Flats - it is alleged that Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) availed by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Profiteering - purchased a flat in the Respondent's project - allegation is that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of...

Profiteering - Construction services - allegation is that the benefit of ITC not passed to customers/flat buyers/recipients, by way of commensurate reduction in the...

Input Tax Credit - Reversal / refunding of ITC - the Integrated Goods and Service Tax (IGST) was not paid and ‘NIL’ return had been filed by the seller but the...

Input tax credit - eligibility of benefit of input tax credit claimed after six months from the date of invoice - the Apex court has held that credit is indefeasible....

Profiteering - purchase of flats - benefit of Input Tax Credit had not been passed on to the Applicant - The Authority determined amount of Rs. 85,77,419/- (including...

Profiteering - Construction Service supplied by the Respondent - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate...

Profiteering - construction service supplied by the Respondent - post-GST, the Respondent has been benefited from additional ITC to the tune of 8.18% [11.74% (-) 3.56%]...

Profiteering - purchase of a flat in the Respondent’s project “Vedantam” - allegation that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit which had...

Profiteering - purchase of flat - benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) not passed - Since the present investigation is only up to 30.06.2018 any benefit of ITC which...

Profiteering - allegation is that the benefit of reduction on the ITC not passed on by way of commensurate reduction in the price - The Respondent cannot deny the...

Works Contract for construction of Flats, Complex — Builders to pass on GST benefit to buyer otherwise anti-profiteering provisions of Section 171 of GST Act to apply - Circular

Quick Updates: