Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2022 Year 2022 This

Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not ...


"Epic" Project: Section 171(1) of CGST Act 2017 Inapplicable Due to Lack of Pre-GST ITC Comparisons.

August 26, 2022

Case Laws     GST     NAPA

Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the Respondent had not availed any CENVAT/ITC, related to ‘EPIC’ project, in pre-GST regime - there was no pre-GST tax rate or ITC structure which could be compared with the post-GST tax rate and ITC structure and therefore, the provisions of Section 171 (1) of the CGST Act, 2017 were not applicable against the Respondent’s project “Epic” - NAPA

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" in the post-GST regime, with commencement certificate issued on 08.03.2018 and GST registration...

  2. Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) for furnishing inaccurate particulars of income - adjustment made u/s 92CA - penalty levied u/s 271(1)(c) on the adjustment made u/s 92CA is not...

  3. Profiteering - supply of purchase of Flat - it is established that there had been no additional benefit of ITC to the Respondent and hence he was not required to pass on...

  4. Belated payment of GST after due date of filing return u/s 139(1) - disallowance u/s 43B - assessee's failure to discharge statutory dues by actual payment within due...

  5. Migration from Composition Scheme to regular scheme of GST payment - Permission to petitioner to file ITC-01 FORM to avail its eligible ITC or input lying on the stock...

  6. The Respondent opted for GST at 5% without ITC as per Notification No. 03/2019-Central Tax (Rate) and reversed all available ITC pertaining to the financial years...

  7. Seeks to extend the due date for furnishing the declaration FORM GST ITC-04

  8. The Appellant sought payment of its pre-CIRP dues from the Respondent in a manner different from the approved resolution plan, which provided for payment of pre-CIRP...

  9. Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

  10. The summary highlights the reversal of Input Tax Credit (ITC) due to the non-electronic filing of Form GST ITC-02 by the transferor company. The key points are: Section...

  11. The GST Council approved formation of a GoM on restructuring Compensation Cess to examine revenue impacts on states post-GST implementation. Key points: Karnataka raised...

  12. Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

  13. Manner of claiming credit in special circumstances - Sub-Rule 1(b) of Rule 40 substituted regarding due date of filing of details in Form GST ITC-01 - See amended Rule 40

  14. The appellant trust claimed to be formed for public charitable activities and registered under the Rajasthan Public Trust Act 1959, regularly filing its income tax...

  15. Service tax recovery from foreign government agencies for statutory fees/licenses - Petitioner's declaration under SVLDRS rejected - HC held pre-deposit amount during...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates