Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
GST - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights August 2024 Year 2024 This

The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" ...


Profiteering allegations dismissed for post-GST real estate project charging 8% GST + ITC.

Case Laws     GST

August 23, 2024

The respondent commenced a real estate project "Swastik Heights" in the post-GST regime, with commencement certificate issued on 08.03.2018 and GST registration effective from 27.02.2018. Initially, GST was charged at 8% with input tax credit (ITC). From 01.04.2019, the respondent had the option to charge either 8% GST with ITC or 1% without ITC, but continued charging 8% with ITC. The Commission observed that since the project commenced in the post-GST period, there was no benefit of rate reduction or additional ITC compared to the pre-GST period that the respondent was obligated to pass on to buyers u/s 171(1) of the CGST Act, 2017. Consequently, the allegations of profiteering were found untenable, and proceedings were dropped.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Profiteering - construction services - The registration and approval of the projects and receipt of the payments had taken place in the post-GST regime and hence, there...

  2. Profiteering - purchase of Duplex Row House - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of ITC although he had charged GST @12% w.e.f. 01.07.2017...

  3. Profiteering - construction of project - benefit of ITC not passed on to the buyers - all the relevant events for the project “Epic” took place in GST regime and the...

  4. Profiteering - flat bought in the Respondent's project - The Respondent had sold 85 units before receipt of Occupancy Certificate out of which 32 units were in...

  5. Profiteering - purchase of a flat - allegation that GST @12% was charged instead of 8% - as noticed from the demand letter Applicant had charged GST @ 12% on the taxable...

  6. Profiteering - purchase of Flat - it is alleged that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in...

  7. Rate of GST - construction and sale of villas - From the definition of the term “apartment”; “residential apartment” “real estate project” and “promoter”, it is clear...

  8. Rate of GST - ITC - The rate of tax to be levied is 12% (8% GST after deducting value of land) in case of Affordable Housing Project. If the project qualifies as an...

  9. Levy of service tax - real estate agent - collecting transfer/administrative charges - Referring to precedents, the Tribunal affirmed that charges for changes in...

  10. Profiteering - purchase of Flat - allegation that the benefit of reduction in the rate of tax or ITC had not been passed on - the Respondent had launched the subject...

  11. Benefit of Exemption from GST - affordable housing - The project referred to in the instant application which is currently under construction by the applicant is a...

  12. Profiteering - construction service - Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) to him by way of commensurate reduction in the prices - the ITC,...

  13. Determination of correct profits - percentage completion method - real estate development - when a stage is arrived that risk and rewards shift from the developer to...

  14. Profiteering - supply of construction service - it has been revealed from the DGAP's Report that the ITC as a percentage of the turnover that was available to the...

  15. Profiteering - DTH services - Entertainment Tax was neither allowed as ITC in pre GST era nor has been allowed in the GST era and same was borne by the Respondent hence...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates