Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount ...

October 31, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount involved in the appeal - disputed amount is less than Rs.2,00,000/- - the appellant failed to appeared for hearing despite notice - the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution in terms of Rule 20 of CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982 as also in terms of Section 35B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 being not maintainable as the disputed amount is less than the threshold limit. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal of the assessee - threshold amount ...

October 31, 2022

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Rectification u/s 154 - Exemption u/s 11(2) - Accumulation of income - The Appellate Tribunal found merit in the appellant's contention regarding the amount to be...

Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

Initiation of CIRP u/s 9 - time limitation - threshold limit of amount claimed - With respect to 234 invoices, which are payable within 30 days of the invoices, 224...

In the case, ITAT decided on two main issues: 1. Addition on account of Gold and Silver Jewellery u/s 69A: Assessee disclosed Rs. 70,00,000 as unexplained investment...

Provisional release of detained goods - The department's insistence on a 100% bank guarantee of Rs. 25,00,000/- was deemed arbitrary and onerous, especially considering...

Plaintiff contended defendants have no real prospect of successfully defending suit claim. Court held limitation issue raised by defendants requires further examination...

Applicability of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act (FERA) provisions to a non-resident bank and its CEO. The bank was charged with contravening sections 64(2), 6(4),...

Demand Interest u/s 201(1A) - Non deduction TDS u/s 194IA - As per the sale deed the details of the sellers / transferors of the said property and in fact the sellers...

The court held that the tax liability arising from the deletion of additions under the remand order would be less than Rs. 1,00,00,000, rendering the appeal...

Jurisdiction of Superintendent to pass the order - Monetary limit - The High Court noted that, the circular dated 9.2.2018 limited the power of the Superintendent,...

The assessment years beyond six years but not exceeding ten years can be reopened u/s 153A only if the Assessing Officer possesses evidence depicting escapement of...

The Appellate Tribunal held that for determining the holding period of a property or calculating long-term capital gains, the date of allotment of the property is...

The case involves imposition of penalty on a Customs House Agent (CHA) u/s 114 (iii) of the Customs Act 1962 for misusing drawback benefit through fraudulent exports....

Disallowance u/s 14A read with Rule 8D - Suo moto disallowance by assessee upheld, disallowance restricted to Rs. 2,00,000 for the year, following HT Media Ltd. decision....

Dishonor of Cheque - he trial court is empowered to direct payment of compensation, double that amount. Rs. 7,02,500/- is the fine imposed in the case on hand and the...

Quick Updates: