Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Customs - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights November 2022 Year 2022 This

Penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 112(b)(i) of the Customs ...


Penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs for smuggling gold under Customs Act, but gold confiscation deemed improper due to lack of conditions.

November 2, 2022

Case Laws     Customs     AT

Penalty of Rs. 40 lakhs under Section 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act - Smuggling - foreign origin gold - The confiscation of gold under the facts and circumstances is bad in absence of condition precedent, as provided under Section 111(d), (o) and (p) of the Customs Act - the appellant has not violated any of the provisions of Section 111 as alleged - AT

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

  2. Confiscation of smuggled gold bars/biscuits u/ss 111(b), 111(d), and 111(f) of the Customs Act, 1962. The appellants failed to establish the licit procurement of the...

  3. Seizure of Gold Bars - Confiscation - Penalty u/s 112(b) - The case involves the interception of the Appellant carrying 17 pieces of gold of foreign origin in Kolkata....

  4. Imported material diverted to unit other than permitted unit, resulting in contravention of import-export policy provisions. Goods held liable for confiscation u/s 111...

  5. CESTAT upheld reclassification of imported high conductivity copper bus bars from CTI 7407 21 20 to CTI 7407 10 30, resulting in denial of FTA benefits under N/N....

  6. Appellate Tribunal reduced penalty imposed on company u/s 50 of FERA, 1973 from Rs.2 crores to Rs.2.5 lakhs for contravention regarding two foreign exchange remittances...

  7. Rejection of declared transaction value under Valuation Rule 12, re-determination of value under Valuation Rules 4-9. Commissioner followed Rule 9, adopted actual values...

  8. Contravention of Sections 8(1) and 9(1)(f)(i) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1973 - receiving foreign exchange payments in 1996-97 through fake export documents...

  9. The case involved a violation of the FEMA Act due to accepting and placing bets on cricket matches for clients. The appellant was linked to the raided premises where...

  10. Confiscating absolutely seven gold bars having foreign make marking - Smuggling - Hyundai Verna Car - sufficient evidence to prove foreign origin goods - The Tribunal...

  11. Customs Officers seized gold bars believing they were liable for confiscation under reasonable belief of smuggling. However, the gold was covered under proper documents,...

  12. Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

  13. Penalty imposed u/s 112a(ii) of Customs Act for smuggling through mis-declaration and undervaluation. Extent of duty evasion uncertain but forensic evidence established...

  14. The appellant's gold was seized at the airport based on suspicions of smuggling. However, procedural irregularities, doubts about the voluntariness of the appellant's...

  15. CESTAT allowed the appeal against confiscation of 449.300 gms of fine gold and penalties imposed on the appellants. It held that the department failed to produce any...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates