Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings ...

ITAT Nullifies Penalty: Section 271D Proceedings Initiated Late, Violating Section 275(1)(c) Time Limit.

November 23, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings u/s 271D - penalty order, was passed beyond the time period prescribed by Section 275(1)(c) - the same having been passed after the lapse of six months from the end of the month in which the penalty proceedings were initiated by the AO - ITAT rightly deleted the penalty - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Period of limitation for levy of penalty - Penalty proceedings ...

ITAT Nullifies Penalty: Section 271D Proceedings Initiated Late, Violating Section 275(1)(c) Time Limit.

November 23, 2022

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Filing of Form GST TRAN-1 - time limit for filing of the form - The time limit stipulated under Rule 117 of the Rules is not ultra vires of the Act. This Rule is...

ITAT ruled against revenue, finding that remuneration paid to the managing director was within permissible limits under Companies Act provisions as per Circular...

Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) - non-compliance of notice issues - if the quantum proceedings itself are declared to be bad in law and quashed , then any non compliance on the...

The High Court quashed the impugned reassessment notices issued u/s 148, holding that the reassessment action was barred by limitation u/s 149(1) read with the First...

The Assessing Officer (AO) consciously deleted irrelevant portions from the show cause notice, mentioning only the charge of furnishing inaccurate particulars of income....

The case pertains to the jurisdiction of impugned orders under the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017, and the time limitation u/s 73 and Section 44 of the Act. The key points are:...

The High Court held that the proceedings initiated u/s 74 of the CGST Act, 2017 were vitiated as the Proper Officer had previously dropped the proceedings u/s 61(2)...

The assessee's request for fixation of special rate of brand-rate drawback was rejected due to non-fulfilment of basic requirements and time limitation. The assessee...

Penalty u/s 271(1) (c) - period of limitation - treatment of lease rent income - in the revised return, assessee claimed the same as income from house property to claim...

Limit limit to pass order u/s. 201(1)/201(1A) - default for non-deduction of tax at source (TDS) - A subsequent amendment to the provision cannot give a new lease of...

The court held that Section 6(2)(b) of the Act treats the empowered officers under the SGST/UGST Act at the central level to be at par and does not prescribe for...

Reassessment proceedings initiated beyond statutory time limit prescribed under pre-amended Section 149(1)(b) quashed. Notice u/s 148 issued after expiry of six-year...

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) held that every non-compliance with a notice u/s 142(1) gives a separate cause of action for levying penalty u/s 271(1)(b)....

Time limit for issue of Notice - Customs Broker - "Issue of Notice" versus "Service of Notice" - The word ‘issue’ in regulation 17 of the 2018 Regulations or regulation...

Validity of order passed u/s 201(1)/201(1A) - Period of limitation - prior to section 201 was amended by Finance Act No.2 of 2009, no time limit was provided for passing...

Quick Updates: