As per Section 238 of the IBC, 2016 is having override effect in ...

Court Defers to NCLT on Insolvency Case; Section 238 of IBC, 2016, and Section 430 of Companies Act, 2013, Apply.

December 28, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

As per Section 238 of the IBC, 2016 is having override effect in any other law for the time being in force. In view of my prima facie findings that this Court cannot pass any interim order at this stage. This Court is of the view that the matter in issue in the suit can be more appropriately and effectively decided and adjudicated by the NCLT. In the present case, Section 430 of the Companies Act, 2013 itself provides an additional bar by stating that no injunction shall be granted by any civil court in respect of any action taken or to be taken in pursuance of any power conferred on the NCLT by the Companies Act, 2013. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

As per Section 238 of the IBC, 2016 is having override effect in ...

Court Defers to NCLT on Insolvency Case; Section 238 of IBC, 2016, and Section 430 of Companies Act, 2013, Apply.

December 28, 2022

Case Laws Insolvency and Bankruptcy HC

You may also like:

The High Court ruled that security interests over assets of a corporate debtor to secure amounts due under a judgment or decree must give way to the provisions of the...

The case pertains to the extinguishment of claims under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, after the acceptance of the...

Income tax proceedings against company dissolved / insolvent - Jurisdiction or authority to reopen or assess income for any period prior to the approval of the...

Validity of demand notice based on the order secured by the petitioner from NCLT - Corporate Insolvency Resolution Plan approved by the NCLT which proposed a NIL value...

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking initiation of fresh voting on petitioner's Resolution Plan after considering principles of equality and...

Amendment of section 7 application - time limitation - date of default - The Supreme Court addressed a case involving the correction of a date mentioned in a previous...

Refusal to stay the proceedings initiated by the Respondent, Axis Bank Limited against the Appellant - The title “Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code” makes it amply clear...

The High Court upheld the validity of Regulation 3(2)(b)(i) of the SEBI (Delisting of Equity Shares) Regulations, 2021, which exempts the delisting of shares pursuant to...

Whether in exercise of powers under the proviso to Section 434 of the Companies Act, 2013, this court should transfer the present proceedings to NCLT? - normally, this...

Under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) was initiated against the first petitioner-company, and a moratorium...

Offences triable by Special Court - offences other than the Companies Act i.e. under the IBC Act - The Supreme Court held that the IBC is a complete code in itself and...

Corporate insolvency resolution process - whether the Company Court has any jurisdiction to stay the proceedings filed by a Corporate Debtor before NCLT even though a...

Interim-moratorium u/s 96 IBC applies to proceedings against petitioner u/s 138 NI Act. HC set aside revisional court order, allowed petition directing stay on Section...

Once the application of Part II is taken away for debts more than ₹ 1 Crore, there is no further jurisdiction available under the Statute to the NCLT to act as an...

CIRP Proceedings under IBC versus Tax Dues / Statutory Dues - The High court noted that NCLT should have been cautious before approving the Corporate Insolvency...

Quick Updates: