Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The presumption of proof ...

Court Rules Incomplete Address Invalid for Notice Service u/s 27, Affecting Appeal Filing Timelines.

January 16, 2023

Case Laws Service Tax HC

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The presumption of proof of service of notice is a rebuttable piece of evidence and the track consignment report having an incomplete address of the petitioner valid service of notice of the order in original cannot be presumed. Section 27 of the General Clauses Act as quoted at paragraph 6 of the impugned appellate order also provides that service shall be deemed to be effected by properly addressing, prepaying and posting it be registered post. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Condonation of delay in filing appeal - The presumption of proof ...

Court Rules Incomplete Address Invalid for Notice Service u/s 27, Affecting Appeal Filing Timelines.

January 16, 2023

Case Laws Service Tax HC

You may also like:

Service of notice u/s 148 of Income Tax - no service effected on address as per PAN - dept was aware of address in bank - by virtue of the further proviso to sub-rule...

The case involved a dispute u/s refund of service tax paid under Export of Services Rules, 2005. The Appellate Tribunal addressed whether the Order-in-Original exceeded...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

HC determined the show-cause notice and Order-in-Original under Finance Act, 1994 were invalid due to improper service procedures under Section 37C of Central Excise...

Export of services or not - Reversal of Credit - The fundamental charge that the service recipients are ‘other establishments’ of service providers in terms of in terms...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

Penalty under Rule 25 of the Central Excise Rules, 2002 - Contravention of Rule 8(3A) - penalty under Rule 25 is not permissible, but penalty under Rule 27 is to be imposed - AT

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

The case pertains to the refund of service tax paid on input services utilized for the export of 'Cut and Polished Diamonds' during October 2015 to March 2016, as per...

The CESTAT ruled that the amount paid by the appellant towards advertisement and promotion of its own franchise outlets cannot be included in the value of taxable...

Application under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules, 1963 - additional grounds - Rule 27 clearly set out that the respondent ‘may support the order appealed against on any of...

Validity of notice issued u/s 148 - service of notice at an address obtained from bank account - when the Department had correct address of the assessee, sending notice...

Non service of notice u/s 143(2) - Apparently, the notice was sent on the wrong address as the assessee has categorically given his address in the relevant return of...

Quick Updates: