Service of notice u/s 148 of Income Tax - no service effected on ...

Notice u/s 148 Invalid Due to Incorrect Address; Tax Department Ignored Bank Records as Per Rule 127.

July 19, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Service of notice u/s 148 of Income Tax - no service effected on address as per PAN - dept was aware of address in bank - by virtue of the further proviso to sub-rule (2) of Rule 127, the communication had to be delivered at the address as available with the banking company - since no such steps were taken for service of notice before the last date envisaged u/s 149 - reopening of assessment was invalid

View Source

← Previous Next →

Service of notice u/s 148 of Income Tax - no service effected on ...

Notice u/s 148 Invalid Due to Incorrect Address; Tax Department Ignored Bank Records as Per Rule 127.

July 19, 2019

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of notice issued u/s 148 - service of notice at an address obtained from bank account - when the Department had correct address of the assessee, sending notice...

Reassessment proceedings were held invalid due to lack of proper jurisdiction by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax while issuing the notice u/s 148. The...

The court held that the notices issued u/s 133(6) and the subsequent notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act were invalid. The petitioner had filed a reply to the notice...

Validity of reassessment order - Notice sent on wrong (old) E-mail ID - The petitioner company had two email addresses, one used until 2019 and another operational since...

Jurisdiction of AO in framing assessment - The assessee’s address was obtained from the bank records in which the assessee has given address of Delhi and on the same...

Validity of the assessment framed u/s 147 - Proof of service of notice - There was no valid service of notice u/s 148 of the Act in the present case. The finding of the...

CIT(A) erred by assuming reassessment proceedings initiated by AO u/s 148A were valid, ignoring merits of earlier assessment orders dated 31.03.2022 passed pursuant to...

Validity of reopening u/s 147 r.w.s. 148 - The Tribunal found that the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer (AO) for reopening the assessment under section 147/148...

Reopening of assessment u/s 147/148 - failure to issue notice u/s 143(2) - reopening of assessment is not valid as the Income Tax Department has power to conduct the...

Re opening of assessment - before issuance of notice u/s 148 reasons were recorded for one issue only - reaons for other two issues were recorded after issuance of ...

The High Court addressed the issue of faceless assessment of income escaping assessment u/s 151A scheme. It held that notices must be issued in a faceless manner as...

HC determined that typographical error in address on notice under s.148 of IT Act does not invalidate reassessment proceedings. Taxpayer's claim for India-Singapore DTAA...

Presumption to service of notice u/s 148 - revenue failed to discharge the onus - also notice which u/s 148 was sent on the address where the assessee was not residing -...

Ex parte order passed based on old PAN number challenged. Society contended all transactions accounted for in audited books, returns filed with new PAN. Department...

The High Court held that the notice issued by the Jurisdictional Assessing Officer (JAO) u/s 148 was invalid as the provisions of Section 151A mandate that such notice...

Quick Updates: