Smuggling - Seizure of mobile handsets of Chinese origin - In ...

Court Orders Release of Seized Chinese Mobile Phones Due to Lack of Evidence from Customs Department.

January 19, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Smuggling - Seizure of mobile handsets of Chinese origin - In view of admitted town seizure, it was the onus on the Customs Department to lead evidence in support of allegation as to the smuggled nature of goods. It is also found from the record that no evidence has been brought on record in support of its allegation. - The respondent –Revenue is directed to release the goods forthwith to the appellant - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Smuggling - Seizure of mobile handsets of Chinese origin - In ...

Court Orders Release of Seized Chinese Mobile Phones Due to Lack of Evidence from Customs Department.

January 19, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

Denial of adjournment request - Release of goods based on forged documents leading to fraud - Customs clearance of imported mobile phones with duplicate IMEI numbers -...

Reopening of assessment without releasing seized documents by Crime branch - Petitioner seeking the release of seized documents and items to effectively respond to...

Provisional attachment order of property - section 83 of the CGST Act, 2017 - This Court did not approve the provisional attachment of the goods, stock and receivables,...

Undervaluation of imported goods - Patchouli Oil - The CESTAT found that the rejection of the declared value lacked legal basis and was unsupported by evidence. The...

Validity of order of lower court for release of goods / return of goods to the accused - Smuggling - yellow coloured metallic bars believed to be gold of Foreign origin...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the legality of additions based on a diary seized from a third party. The Tribunal held that the presumption u/s 132(4A) of the Act...

The case involved smuggling of 154 mobile phones, leading to absolute confiscation and penalty u/s 114 of the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the...

Mobile Battery Chargers (MBC), cannot be treated as part of the Mobile Phones itself and they are mere accessories of the Mobile Phone and are to be taxed separately...

Seizure of goods as smuggled into the country from Myanmar u/s 130 of the Customs Act, 1962. The burden of proof lies on the respondent u/s 123 to show that the seized...

CESTAT dismissed an appeal concerning refund claims for excess Countervailing Duty (CVD) on mobile phone imports. The tribunal upheld rejection on three grounds:...

Customs officials seized gold jewelry from petitioners on 23-02-2023. Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 mandates issuing show cause notice u/s 124 within six months of...

This case pertains to the release of seized cash. The cash was found at the petitioner's office premises, and due to the lack of satisfactory evidence regarding its...

The High Court considered a case involving the release of seized goods u/s 110A. The issue was the non-issuance of a show cause notice within the stipulated time due to...

Wrong declaration of imported goods - CARLVO Dual Sim Chinese Cellular Phones under Bill of Entry No.5256566 - goods ordered to be released - HC

Classification of imported goods - earphones with microphones - the earphone will qualify as an accessory which can be used with cellular mobile phone as well as other...

Quick Updates: