Without Sufficient Cause - There is no ambiguity in holding that ...

Court Highlights Need to Prove "Sufficient Cause" u/s 7(5) of OET Act to Avoid Tax Penalties.

March 20, 2023

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

Without Sufficient Cause - There is no ambiguity in holding that in the presence of the expression “without sufficient cause” in sub-section (5) of Section 7 of the OET Act and the petitioner(s) having justified by showing sufficient cause for failure to deposit amount of tax due along with the return, which cannot be treated as admitted tax in view of legal position contained in paragraph 30 of Reliance Industries Ltd. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Without Sufficient Cause - There is no ambiguity in holding that ...

Court Highlights Need to Prove "Sufficient Cause" u/s 7(5) of OET Act to Avoid Tax Penalties.

March 20, 2023

Case Laws VAT and Sales Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of Service of notice u/s 74(5) instead of u/s 74(1) of CGST / UPGST Act, 2017 - Non-payment of Tax / GST - The High Court observed that while a notice was...

Claim of second sale exemption and the imposition of penalty u/s 12(5)(iii). The High Court held that when the burden was on the dealer to prove the factum of second...

This legal summary concerns the maintainability of a Section 7 application for initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against a Corporate Debtor....

Petitioner cannot evade penalty u/s 22(5) of TNVAT Act, 2006 by paying tax after inspection but before assessment order. Rule 7(9) of TNVAT Rules, 2007 prohibits filing...

Penalty for non deduction of tax at source - bona fide belief proved - penalty set aside - AT

Determination of service tax liability on the approval of resolution plant under IBC - The amount of service tax dues having thus crystallized, the resolution plan says...

Source of Income of Public Servant or Ostensible Owner - Addl. CIT - Abuse of official position, as public servant - possession of disproportionate assets - This Court...

Admission of section 7 application - financial debt or not - The Tribunal affirmed that the disbursal of ₹5 crores to the corporate debtor by the financial...

The HC ruled in favor of the petitioner, ordering the release of seized goods upon deposit of the valuation amount. The court found that the respondent failed to provide...

The High Court addressed the issue of linking services provided by a company to its separate registered units for taxation purposes under CENVAT Credit Rules. The court...

The High Court examined the challenge to the assessment and demand orders, validity of the show cause notice (SCN), discrepancy in the assessment amount compared to the...

The High Court held that u/s 54 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, when the input tax credit paid is higher than the output tax, the dealer is entitled to seek a...

Impugned show cause notice for shortfall in service tax payment based on Rule 5(1) of Service Tax (Determination of Value) Rules, 2006 quashed as ultra vires Section 67...

Refund of excess Input Tax Credit - The lump-sum payment of composite tax under Section 16(2) of the Act in no way can be equated with the powers of State under Section...

Initiation of CIRP - validity of condonation of delay of 1392 days in filing Section 7 Application - In the facts and circumstances of the present case, the delay of...

Quick Updates: