Oppression and Mismanagement - This Appellate Tribunal further ...

Appellate Tribunal Questions Why 94.8% Shareholders Aren't in Control of Company Management and Board.

April 13, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law AT

Oppression and Mismanagement - This Appellate Tribunal further finds it surprising that although the Appellants is claiming to hold 94.8% of Share Capital of the 1st Respondent Company, yet they did not bother to take over the management and control of the 1st Respondent Company. It is natural and established commercial prudence that person holding the majority of share will have dominating position in composition of Board of Directors of the Company - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Oppression and Mismanagement - This Appellate Tribunal further ...

Appellate Tribunal Questions Why 94.8% Shareholders Aren't in Control of Company Management and Board.

April 13, 2023

Case Laws Companies Law AT

You may also like:

The Appellate Tribunal found the Appellant Company guilty of contravening u/s 9(1)(a) of FERA 1973 by making payments to a person outside India without RBI permission....

The Appellate Tribunal dismissed the Section 7 application filed by the Appellant, ruling that the share application money deposited by the Appellant with the Corporate...

Section 94(8) as retrospective in operation or prospective - Dividend stripping in buying and selling of shares and units - Avoidance of tax by certain transactions in...

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) is not taxable in the hands of the assessee company if it is not a shareholder in the companies that extended loans. It is chargeable to tax...

Gain/loss on sale of shares - legal nature of the transaction - As per companies Act shareholder and company both are two separate legal person capable of holding...

Oppression and mismanagement - It is admitted fact that the major portion of the equity shares (2/3rd) are held by the 1st and 3rd petitioners and the 2nd Respondent...

Applicability of Section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, in a company law matter involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement u/ss 96, 173,...

It cannot be countenanced that some shareholders can take shelter under Regulation 29 to plead confidentiality of settlement information, against a group of other...

Exemption to Section 8 Companies under section 462 of CA, 2013 - Notification

Disallowance of legal expenses - the complaint filed before the Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Court has been made against the Directors / Shareholders in individual...

SSI exemption - Use of old shareholder's brand name - if the brand name were owned and used by the same company under the old management there is no need of transfer...

Corporate dispute involving allegations of oppression and mismanagement by equal shareholders. Key points: Oppression implies lack of probity or equity, intention behind...

Sale of property of the company to the third parties - oppression and mismanagement - it is quite clear that the even though the sales made in the years 2013 and 2014...

The Appellate Tribunal considered the taxability of freight income u/s 44B for a foreign company incorporated in Singapore operating ships globally, including in India....

Deemed dividend u/s 2(22)(e) - two shareholders of the assessee company having 70% and 30% of shares respectively are registered shareholders of the lending companies -...

Quick Updates: