Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
Income Tax - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights June 2023 Year 2023 This

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted ...


High Court mandates Revenue to follow Evidence Act for cross-examination in tax cases, ensuring clarity and fairness.

June 2, 2023

Case Laws     Income Tax     HC

Denial of cross-examination process of witness - ACIT restricted cross examination process by denying the questions asked by the Petitioner during cross examination - CIT (Appeal) has specifically directed that as the Evidence Act is the law of the land, the income tax authorities are bound to abide by its provisions. As gone through the directions in the remand order wherein he has allowed the appellant, cross examination of the witnesses whose statements have been utilized by the Assessing Officer in the assessment order. There is no ambiguity in the said directions. - the Revenue directed to conduct cross-examination in accordance with law and the guidelines as referred to hereinabove. - HC

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

  2. Revenue recognition based on Accounting Standard (AS) 7 for advance received from customers under contracts - assessee followed Percentage Completion Method (PCM)...

  3. This circular outlines the implementation of ICETABs, mobile tablet devices for Customs Officers, to facilitate efficient examination and clearance of import...

  4. The ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal regarding foreign tax credit for state taxes paid in the United States under Section 91, despite the existence of an India-USA...

  5. The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between...

  6. The High Court held that u/s 54 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, when the input tax credit paid is higher than the output tax, the dealer is entitled to seek a...

  7. Principles of natural justice - request for cross examination of panch-witnesses and of departmental officers has been rejected - the allegations of Show Cause Notice...

  8. The High Court held that the petitioner was eligible to apply under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019, for resolving legacy tax disputes. The...

  9. Validity of order u/s 144C - Failure to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C(1) - This Court is of the view that till the Income Tax Department ensures that the...

  10. The summary focuses on the rejection of cross-examination of DRI officers and a co-noticee by the competent authority. The main objective of cross-examination is to...

  11. Assessee followed joint venture model for sharing revenue with collaborators as per franchise agreement. Assessee recorded all revenues, incurred expenditure, and shared...

  12. Exempt supply of service or not - printing of Pre examination items - printing of Post examination items - scanning and processing of results of examinations - In the...

  13. Method of accounting - taxation of an amount as income - It is not the case of the revenue that the income under these projects have not been offered to tax in...

  14. Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

  15. This case discusses various issues related to the income tax assessment of a bank. The key points are: Disallowance of expenditure incurred for reservation of seats in...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates