Tax Management India. Com
Law and Practice  :  Digital eBook
Research is most exciting & rewarding
  TMI - Tax Management India. Com
Follow us:
  Facebook   Twitter   Linkedin   Telegram
FEMA - Highlights / Catch Notes

Home Highlights March 2025 Year 2025 This

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of ...


Denial of Cross-Examination Not a Natural Justice Violation When No Prejudice Demonstrated in FERA Proceedings

March 15, 2025

Case Laws     FEMA     AT

The AT rejected appellant's contention that denial of cross-examination of departmental officers violated natural justice principles. The tribunal distinguished between proceedings under Customs Act and FERA, noting that appellants failed to demonstrate how cross-examination would have altered the case outcome or how its denial caused prejudice during adjudication. The AT determined that absence of cross-examination was not fatal to the proceedings and did not prejudice appellants' case. Consequently, the tribunal upheld the impugned interlocutory orders as maintainable and sustainable, finding no violation of natural justice principles in the Special Director's refusal to permit cross-examination of officers who recorded statements.

View Source

 


 

You may also like:

  1. Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - revocation of customs broker license, forfeiture of security deposit, and penalty imposed by...

  2. The AT dismissed the appeals challenging denial of cross-examination requests for officers who recorded statements under the Customs Act and FERA. The tribunal...

  3. Violation of principles of natural justice - From the statutory provision of section 138 B, it is not the option for the Adjudicating Authority to allow or not to allow...

  4. Clandestine Removal - As per the provisions of section 9D it is clear that during adjudication, the adjudicating authority is required to first examine the witness in...

  5. The HC dismissed a petition challenging a GST adjudication order on grounds of natural justice violations, specifically denial of cross-examination opportunity. The...

  6. The High Court addressed a case involving a violation of natural justice principles due to the rejection of the petitioner's request for cross-examination in a matter...

  7. Principles of natural justice - request for cross examination of panch-witnesses and of departmental officers has been rejected - the allegations of Show Cause Notice...

  8. Violation of principles of natural justice - denial of cross-examination - pre-mature appeal - The Tribunal ruled that the issue of denial of cross-examination could be...

  9. Clandestine removal - The denial of cross-examination tantamount to violation of natural justice. The demand has wholly been raised, on the basis of the statements...

  10. Validity of reassessment order u/s 147 - Denial of Cross-Examination Opportunity - Reliance of statement of third party - The High Court noted that the petitioner did...

  11. The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) set aside the impugned order and remanded the cases back to the adjudicating authority. The appellants...

  12. Misdeclaration of description and value - Validity of test report - Cross examination of Chemical Examiner - In the present matter, refusal to allow cross-examination of...

  13. Reassessment proceedings initiated u/s 147 were quashed by ITAT for violation of principles of natural justice due to lack of opportunity for cross-examination of...

  14. Violation of principles of natural justice - opportunity for cross-examination. Evidentiary value of statements recorded u/s 14 of the Central Excise Act, 1944 cannot be...

  15. Clandestine removal of goods - the cross-examination of person from whose premises these documents had been recovered was necessary, more so when the same had been...

 

Quick Updates:Latest Updates