Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry - faceless assessment - in a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 6, 2023

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry - faceless assessment - in a faceless regime, normally there cannot be a case of prejudice of lack of enquiry for the reason that there is application of mind by multiple officers of Department and not by a single officer and thus at the end of our discussion, we are of the view that the assessee firm had furnished the requisite information and the NFAC has completed the assessment after considering all the facts, therefore, the order passed by the AO cannot be termed as erroneous. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry - faceless assessment - in a ...

Case Laws Income Tax

July 6, 2023

You may also like:

Revision u/s 263 - Lack of enquiry is a reason for taking up the case for revision u/s 263 of the Act but the inadequate enquiry cannot be a reason for taking up the...

The Appellate Tribunal examined the issue of invoking revisional jurisdiction u/s 263 in a case involving receipts of accommodation entries and reopening of assessment....

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - lack of inquiry v/s inadequate inquiry - apparently from the records and as per the observations of the Ld. PR. CIT, coupled with the failure...

Revision u/s 263 - lack of inquiry by AO - it is a case where the AO did not make any inquiry vis-à-vis the share premium and simply accepted the details filed by the...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - It is the duty of the AO to ascertain the truth of the facts stated / submitted by the assessee especially when the circumstances of the case...

Revision u/s 263 - There is no quarrel on the point that if the AO has raised the query on this issue of applicability of provision of section 115BBE which was replied...

Revision u/s 263 - limited scrutiny assessment - Failure to make enquiry in such circumstances would make the assessment order erroneous and prejudicial to the interest...

Revision u/s 263 - distinction between "lack of enquiry" and "inadequate enquiry" - AO is not required to give detailed reason in respect of each and every item of...

Revision u/s 263 - merely because the ld. PCIT does not agree with the order of the AO cannot make the order erroneous as long as the same was passed after all possible...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 - Erroneous allowance of deduction u/s 54B - it is not the case that the AO has not made enquiry. Indeed the Pr. CIT initiated proceedings under section...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - reopening on the basis of letter written by JCIT - In the case in hand the Ld. Revisional Authority has done no homework on its end but merely...

Revision u/s 263 by CIT - Unexplained cash deposit received from various persons - Once the Assessing Officer has taken a view based on the explanation as well as...

Revision u/s 263 - “no inquiry” v/s “inadequate inquiry” - there is a distinction between merely calling for information on a particular issue and considering such...

Revision u/s 263 - Bogus LTCG/Share transaction - as per CIT AO failed to make necessary enquiries to ascertain the actual strength of the company, investment profile of...

Quick Updates: