Levy of Penalty u/s 112(b)(i)- Smuggling of Gold Bars - town ...

Penalty u/s 112(b)(i) for gold smuggling challenged due to lack of evidence and natural justice breach.

July 28, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Levy of Penalty u/s 112(b)(i)- Smuggling of Gold Bars - town seizure - There is violation of the provision of Section 138C of the Act, as well as the principles of natural justice. It is also found that it is the case of town seizure, and revenue have not laid any evidence as to the smuggled nature of gold, save and except assumption and presumption, and relying on the retracted statement. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Levy of Penalty u/s 112(b)(i)- Smuggling of Gold Bars - town ...

Penalty u/s 112(b)(i) for gold smuggling challenged due to lack of evidence and natural justice breach.

July 28, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT set aside penalties imposed under s.112(a) and s.112(b) of Customs Act 1962 against appellant for alleged gold smuggling. Court found insufficient evidence beyond...

CESTAT allowed the appeal against confiscation of 449.300 gms of fine gold and penalties imposed on the appellants. It held that the department failed to produce any...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Appellant proved ownership of gold bars through valid invoices, discharging initial onus. Revenue failed to establish invoices unrelated to seized gold, lacking inquiry...

Evidences indicate appellant was aware of smuggling activities involving diversion of smuggled cigarettes concealed in transit container, providing transportation and...

The case involved penalties u/ss 112(a) and 112(b) of the Customs Act for smuggling foreign gold. The tribunal held that statements without cross-examination are...

Levy of penalty u/s 112 (b) of the Customs Act, 1962 - Smuggling - gold biscuits of foreign origin - demand merely on the basis of the statements of the employees of the...

Appellant financed an individual for smuggling gold from Dubai and selling it in India. Penalty was imposed u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act, 1962. The Commissioner held...

Levy of penalty - smuggling of Gold - baggage rules - The case involved the petitioner's challenge against the imposition of a penalty under Sections 112(a) and 112(b)...

Smuggling of gold - Imposition of penalties u/s 112 - The appellants were intercepted along with their luggage, which was found to contain smuggled gold bars. However,...

Smuggling - Absolute confiscation of three gold bars and one small piece of remelted gold - Penalty u/s 112(a) and (b)(i) of Customs Act - The Tribunal noted that the...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act 1962 - smuggling of Gold activity - reliability of statements - The appellant cannot come within the ambit of Section...

CESTAT dismissed the Department's appeal, upholding the Commissioner (Appeals) order which had set aside penalties under Section 112(a) and 112(b)(i) of the Customs Act...

CESTAT ruled against absolute confiscation of gold and penalties under s.112(b) of Customs Act, 1962. Officers seized gold based on alleged smuggling from Bangladesh,...

Quantum of penalty u/s 112(b) of the Customs Act - Smuggling - Gold Jewellery - Role of the petitioner in the act of smuggling the gold and currency notes is quite...

Quick Updates: