Excess provision claim under the heads consultancy charges - ...

Consultancy Charges Excess Provision Claim Ruled as Ascertained Liability, Permitting Deduction in Negotiations.

March 14, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Excess provision claim under the heads consultancy charges - During the negotiations with the parties the provision was made on the basis of original claim made by the parties - held as ascertained liability - deduction allowed - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Excess provision claim under the heads consultancy charges - ...

Consultancy Charges Excess Provision Claim Ruled as Ascertained Liability, Permitting Deduction in Negotiations.

March 14, 2013

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

MAT computation u/s 115JB - Adjustment for computation of book profits u/s. 115JB on the ground that expenses are unascertained liability. - The Tribunal addressed each...

Eligibility to make adjustment of excess service tax paid against future service tax liability - Claim of Excess service tax paid due to issuance of revised invoice -...

MAT - Book Adjustments - ascertained liability - where the computation of the provision for bonus was on the basis of Payment of Bonus Act, 1965, the same is ascertained...

Adjustment of excess service tax paid with subsequent service tax liability - case of Revenue is that Rule 6 (3) of Service Tax Rules, 1994 do not provide for such...

Provision for ascertained liability or contingent liability - Tribunal committed a serious error in law in holding that such ad hoc provision would nevertheless qualify...

Short payment of service tax - subsequent adjustment with excess tax paid - The appellant can adjust the service tax excess paid against his service tax liability for...

ITAT ruled AMP expenses did not constitute international transaction under Section 92B, as Revenue failed to establish existence of arrangement between assessee and AE...

Refund claim - export of goods - excess carried forward in the annual return - Rule 41(4) of the Haryana Value Added Tax Rules, 2003 - no refund was allowed as the...

Liability of GST - rate of GST - pure agent services or not - The supplier of the applicant does not fulfil/satisfy all the conditions required for being a ‘Pure agent’...

Adjustment of excess payment of service tax - Sub-rule (3) of Rule 6 of the Service Tax Rules, 1994 have been amended providing for adjustment of excess payment against...

Import / Export of services - with effect from 20/06/2012 a specific Rule has been prescribed called Place of Provision of Service Rules, 2012. Though these Rules are...

The case pertains to the disallowance of a provision for contract losses by the CIT(A) and AO, who erroneously concluded it as an unascertained liability not deductible...

Deduction of Interest liability - merely because assessee has disputed its liability it can can not be held as un-ascertained liability - interest liability of earlier...

Profiteering - supply of restaurant service - The Respondent was legally not required to collect the excess GST and therefore, he has not only violated the provisions of...

Ascertain liability / expenses - The maxim "debitum in praesenti solvendum in futuro" relied on by the ld. Authorised Representative, can apply only if there is an...

Quick Updates: