Maintainability of appeal - The Commissioner (Appeal) was not ...

August 3, 2023

Case Laws GST HC

Maintainability of appeal - The Commissioner (Appeal) was not justified in deciding the matter on merits after having come to a conclusion that the appeal is to be rejected on the ground of no proof of pre-deposit - Commissioner (Appeal) directed to issue a defect memo to the Petitioner pointing out the procedural defect in the appeal and would give adequate opportunity for rectifying the same - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Maintainability of appeal - The Commissioner (Appeal) was not ...

August 3, 2023

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Tribunal not deciding the matter itself and remanding it to the Assessing Officer - it is noticed that the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding...

Remand of the matter - the approach of the Tribunal is to abdicate its duty of deciding the matter on the merits or to retain the matter till the outcome of the pending...

Validity of issuance of SCN - Demand of service tax - Post GST era - It is ordered that the petitioner Company may give their detailed written submissions/written...

Tribunal having decided not to proceed with the matter on the ground of condonation of delay, cannot unilaterally decide the appeals on merits, more so when the...

The merit of the order of the Committee of Commissioner of Central Excise granting approval may not be subjected to challenge, as the appeal in any case has to be...

CIT(A) allowed assessee to withdraw appeal against section 263 revision order, stating Tribunal quashed section 263 order and CIT(A) erred in not deciding appeal merits....

Maintainability of appeal - time limitation - No doubt there was no application seeking Condonation of delay was filed by the appellant as has been acknowledged by ld....

The assessee challenged the order before the CIT(A) both on merits as well as on jurisdiction and the limitation grounds - Ld. CIT(A) ought to have first decided the...

The Commercial Tax Tribunal cannot proceed to consider and decide an appeal ex parte in the absence of the revisionist/appellant, as it would violate principles of...

The Commissioner(Appeals) has allowed the appeals of the appellant on merits but still remanded the matter back to the original adjudicating authority for de novo...

Scheme of faceless assessment - the time given to the petitioner to show cause was virtually of three days only - It is deemed appropriate that rather than this Bench,...

Validity of the decision High Court deciding the appeal on admission state itself on merit - The Supreme Court observed that while the High Court had framed certain...

The Tribunal thereafter could not have proceeded to examine the matter on merits after setting aside the order under Section 263 of the Act with reference to Section...

Section 264 revision application concerning long-term capital gain (LTCG) on extinguishment of shares due to loss arising from NCLT order. Petitioner's claim for loss on...

The appellate authority erred in deciding the appeal ex-parte in the absence of the appellant or their counsel. The statutory mandate requires the appellate authority to...

Quick Updates: