Confiscation of medicines which were being carried while ...

Medicines Confiscated While Traveling Deemed Commercial; Penalty Under Customs Act Section 114(i); Redemption Allowed Instead of Absolute Confiscation.

October 10, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

Confiscation of medicines which were being carried while travelling out of India - Penalty u/s 114 (i) of Customs Act - commercial quantity - restricted goods - although the Order of confiscation upheld, the Order of absolute confiscation set aside. In such circumstances, the Appellant was entitled to redemption of the goods. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Confiscation of medicines which were being carried while ...

Medicines Confiscated While Traveling Deemed Commercial; Penalty Under Customs Act Section 114(i); Redemption Allowed Instead of Absolute Confiscation.

October 10, 2023

Case Laws Customs AT

You may also like:

CESTAT Mumbai held that confiscation of imported goods and imposition of penalty u/s 112(a) of Customs Act for forged Special Import Licenses lacked clear evidence...

Smuggling - illegal importation of the seized gold - Confiscation of the gold and Indian currency - The Tribunal found no evidence linking the seized Indian currency to...

Confiscation - fine - penalty - Mis-declaring the quantity of cigarettes imported under warehouse bill of entry for re-export purpose - The customs authorities...

Suspension of Customs Broker License - Deemed Suspension or automatic suspension? - There is no existence of any provision of “Deemed Suspension” or “automatic...

The case involved a challenge to the imposition of penalties and confiscation of goods under the Customs Act, 1962. The Appellate Tribunal found that the penalties...

Container storage charges - The High Court upheld the decision of the single judge, stating that since the goods were indeed confiscated by customs authorities while in...

CESTAT, an Appellate Tribunal, considered a case involving penalty u/s 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 on a co-noticee who is a Partner in a Customs Broker firm for...

Levy of penalty u/s 76 - Power of Commissioner (appeals) to impose penalty - It is found that the impugned order has travelled beyond the OIO because in the OIO, the...

The CESTAT held that the customs authorities lacked the legal authority to impose duty liability or confiscate the salvage equipment imported for the MSC Chitra incident....

CBIC has modified Circular No. 32/2019 regarding disposal of drones through Circular No. 06/2025-Customs. The amendment designates five focal Customs Commissionerates...

Imposition of penalty - Smuggling - Gold bars of foreign origin - illegally imported goods - CESTAT held that, once the two Appellants disputed the fact of recovery of...

This instruction revises the mapping of Customs jurisdictions to Focal Customs Commissionerates (FCCs) and India Government (IG) Mints for disposal of seized/confiscated...

Imposition of penalties u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act 1962 on Customs broker - import of used Multifunction Digital Photocopiers and Printers - it is alleged that the...

Levy of penalty u/s 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962 on an employee of the Customs Broker - classification of imported goods - The commissioner has recorded as finding...

Levy of penalty on Customs Broker under Section 132 read with Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962 - a Customs House Agent or a Customs Broker cannot be fastened with...

Quick Updates: