Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s ...

High Court Rules No Penalty for Non-Disclosure u/s 271AA; Reasonable Cause Shown for Related Party Confusion.

October 28, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s 92E - as to whether SPMCECL was a related party is an issue qua which there can possibly be more than one view. Assessee has taken a stand that the legal advice that it received seems to indicate that it was not a related party. CIT(A) has done its own analysis of the Chinese Law and concluded that it was a related party to the transaction and hence required disclosure. - No penalty being reasonable cause shown - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Penalty u/s 271AA - failure to make disclosures, as required u/s ...

High Court Rules No Penalty for Non-Disclosure u/s 271AA; Reasonable Cause Shown for Related Party Confusion.

October 28, 2023

Case Laws Income Tax HC

You may also like:

Validity of SCN - Department interpreted the remand order as a direction to issue SCN - The genesis of a litigation is the issuance of show cause notice. The intention...

The Appellant, a related party unsecured financial creditor, challenged the resolution plan approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) and the Adjudicating Authority,...

Delay in adjudication of SCN - show-cause notice has not been adjudicated upon for about 16 years - It is not expected from the assessee to preserve the evidence/record...

CIRP - discrimination of Related Party Financial or Operational Creditor - IBC treats related parties as a separate category for specified purposes, excluding from the...

CIRP proceedings - Financial Creditors - Related party - while the default rule under the first proviso to Section 21(2) is that only those financial creditors that are...

Penalty u/s 271D for violation of Section 269SS was challenged. ITAT held that where assessee received sale consideration for immovable property in cash exceeding Rs....

Waiver of penalty or benefit of reduced penalty @25% - Appellant has shown reasonable cause for non payment of service tax and considering facts that the appellant has...

The assessee had not obtained and furnished the Audit Report from the Accountant within the due date. The Tribunal held that the levy of penalty u/s 271B is not...

Levy of Penalty u/s 112 - Scope of the show cause notice - The CESTAT noted that, no show cause notice has been issued proposing the demand of differential duty or the...

Non-filer assessee had taxable income but failed to file return u/s 139(1), later filed return in response to notice u/s 148 without considering section 50C provisions,...

Validity of SCN - extended period of limitation - earlier show cause notice was adjudicated by the Authority and the proceedings were dropped - In the present case, the...

Addendum to show-cause notice after receipt of the reply to show-cause - the learned Commissioner has erred in issuing addendum to show-cause notice after receipt of the...

Penalty levied u/s 272A(1)(d) for non-compliance with documentary evidence requirements was challenged by the assessee, citing COVID-19 restrictions as a reasonable...

Penalty u/s 271C - Reasonable cause - In the substance of this case after the decision of ITAT, the disallowance was sustained but at the same time the assessee was...

Penalty u/s 272A (2) (k) - assessee has failed to submit the quarterly TDS statements in Form No. 26Q - The reasonable cause of ignorance of technical knowledge lack of...

Quick Updates: