Coercive methods adopted for deposit of tax - since the ...

Petitioner Cannot Be Forced to Deposit Tax Without Following CGST Act Procedures; Coercive Methods Not Allowed.

November 6, 2023

Case Laws GST HC

Coercive methods adopted for deposit of tax - since the petitioner has unequivocally made clear that he does not wish to voluntarily deposit any tax with the concerned authority and there is no dispute that the petitioner cannot be compelled to deposit the tax without following the procedure under Section 73, 74 and 79 of the CGST Act. - HC

View Source

← Previous Next →

Coercive methods adopted for deposit of tax - since the ...

Petitioner Cannot Be Forced to Deposit Tax Without Following CGST Act Procedures; Coercive Methods Not Allowed.

November 6, 2023

Case Laws GST HC

You may also like:

Criminal complaint filed u/s 200 of Cr.P.C. for the offence punishable u/s 276C(2) read with Section 278B of the Income Tax Act. Petitioners failed to deposit assessed...

Petitioner challenged adjudication order u/s 73 of CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 regarding discrepancies in returns, short payment of tax, and excess availment of Input Tax...

Petitioner deposited amount under alleged coercion and protest, claiming inadmissible Input Tax Credit availed. Respondent disputed coercion, stating voluntary deposit....

Offence u/s 276(C)(2) and 277 - Allegation of willful tax evasion and non-payment of admitted tax - compounding application. The petitioner submitted income tax return...

One Time Settlement Scheme for Recovery of Outstanding Dues, 2023. The Court held that the amount deposited by the petitioner, which was categorized as disputed tax,...

Petition challenging initiation of criminal proceedings against petitioner, Managing Director of a company, for alleged tax evasion by misrepresenting vehicle ownership...

HC set aside the impugned order regarding time limitation and GSTR-3B/GSTR-2A mismatch dispute. The petitioner's willingness to deposit 25% of disputed tax amount was...

The petitioner's denial of refund of input tax credit debited as a pre-deposit was challenged. The court held that the non-inclusion of freight and pumping charges...

Addition u/s.56(2)(vii)(b) - share premium - difference between the issue price and the actual share price determined by the AO - AO has changed the method of valuation...

HC ruled on tax settlement scheme interpretation regarding admitted versus disputed tax amounts. Settlement Officer erroneously deducted pre-deposit from disputed amount...

Seeking a direction that the term “excisable goods” in Entry 107 of the Notification No.50/2017-Customs dated 30th June 2017 to include “taxable goods subject to tax...

Scope of Deposits - amounts collected by the petitioners for sale of immovable property as advance - would come under the purview of ‘deposits’ or would exempt from the...

Manner of payment of Pre-deposit amount before filing of appeal against demand of service tax - Admissibility of payment of pre-deposit using DRC-03 - The appellant...

Refund of amount deposited during investigation proceedings - voluntary deposit or not - Recovery of wrongful input tax credit - The Court found that in the instant...

TP Adjustment - ALP is determined by TPO by not applying any method at all or by choosing a method which is not prescribed u/s.92C(1) of the Act, then such a...

Quick Updates: