Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the ...

Refund Entitlement Confirmed: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable to Protested Duty Payments.

December 2, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the principal unjust enrichment does not apply to cases where duty has been paid to protest - unjust enrichment does not apply to the refund claim in the impugned appeal. - AT

View Source

← Previous Next →

Refund - amount paid by the appellant under protest - the ...

Refund Entitlement Confirmed: Unjust Enrichment Doctrine Inapplicable to Protested Duty Payments.

December 2, 2023

Case Laws Central Excise AT

You may also like:

Refund claims – unjust enrichment – service tax paid under protest – refund allowed - AT

Refund – doctrine of unjust enrichment would not apply to fine and penalty - AT

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Refund claim - Duty paid under protest - Doctrine of unjust enrichment - Dispute relating to classification was resolved in favor appellant assessee - The tribunal found...

The appellant paid service tax under protest and filed a refund claim, which was not barred by limitation. The Supreme Court in West Bengal vs Calcutta Club Limited held...

Refund - unjust enrichment - excise duty has not been claimed from the buyer of the goods and the same has been reflected in “Excise Duty Refund Receivable Account” -...

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

The case involved a refund claim for duty paid under protest, rejected on the ground of unjust enrichment. The appellant paid duty under protest and filed a refund claim...

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

The CESTAT held that the amounts deposited by the appellant on the direction of departmental officers for detected shortages cannot be considered voluntary deposits. As...

Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding unjust enrichment not applicable retrospectively for finalization of provisional assessments prior to 1999....

Refund claim - duty paid under protest - unjust enrichment - Time bar - benefit of ‘payment of duty under protest’ made by the manufacturer cannot be extended to the buyer - AT

Refund of duty paid under protest – unjust enrichment is not applicable where amount deposited under protest - AT

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Quick Updates: