Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding ...

Retrospective unjust enrichment proviso inapplicable for pre-1999 provisional assessments finalization. Delay by authorities can't deny refund claim.

Case Laws Central Excise

October 21, 2024

Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding unjust enrichment not applicable retrospectively for finalization of provisional assessments prior to 1999. Entitlement to refund and finalization independent of Section 11B refund provisions. Delay in passing Assessment Order not attributable to assessee cannot defeat refund claim on unjust enrichment grounds u/r 9B(5) proviso. Tribunal order in consonance with law, no substantial question of law, appeal dismissed.

View Source

← Previous Next →

Proviso to Rule 9B(5) of Central Excise Rules, 1944 regarding ...

Retrospective unjust enrichment proviso inapplicable for pre-1999 provisional assessments finalization. Delay by authorities can't deny refund claim.

Case Laws Central Excise

October 21, 2024

You may also like:

Unjust enrichment - provisional assessment - The procedure regarding unjust enrichment of finalization of provisional assessment will be applicable to the provisional...

Pre deposit made by VODAFONE shall not be subject to the doctrine of unjust enrichment

Refund claim - finalization of provisional assessment - unjust enrichment - captive consumption - even in respect of captive consumption, unjust enrichment provision is...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Merely because it was shown as expenditure, the department cannot contend that pre-deposit made by appellant is hit by unjust...

Refund of Excess Excise Duty - principles of unjust enrichment - the provisional assessment was directed in the year 1995 and relevant documents for finalisation of...

Refund of excess Excise duty paid - unjust enrichment - finalization of provisional assessment - adjustments at the time of finalization of provisional assessments would...

The appellant filed bills of entry claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus, which was denied during re-assessment. The Commissioner (Appeals) rectified...

Rejection of refund - Pre-deposit or receivable - principles of unjust enrichment - On the one hand, the appellant claims that the amount paid is to be treated as...

Refund claim of duty paid on short landing of imported goods. Unjust enrichment principle inapplicable as duty amount shown as receivable in books of accounts, certified...

Refund of Service Tax - Principles of unjust enrichment - The Appellate Tribunal reviewed a case where the appellant, a service provider, erroneously charged Service...

Remission of Central Excise Duty - The tribunal found Rule 21 inapplicable, as it pertains to goods lost or destroyed before clearance from the factory, not to loss of...

The CESTAT examined the applicability of the doctrine of unjust enrichment u/s 11B of the Central Excise Act, 1944, for refund claims. It held that Rule 6(3) of the CCR...

Show cause notice demanding interest was confirmed by the original Adjudicating Authority and settled under SVLDRS Scheme, thus refund of the confirmed amount does not...

Refund claim - unjust enrichment - Validity of CA certificate - both the CA certificates are of very old period and for the purpose of unjust-enrichment the present...

Refund - principles of unjust enrichment - the unjust enrichment is not applicable even when the refund amount is claimed as expenses in the Profit and Loss Account.

Quick Updates: